Good morning all,
> > First of all let's see what types of reputation system exist (and yes,
> > this is my very informal categorization):
> >
> > - First hand experience
> > - Inferred experience
> > - Hearsay
> >
> > The first two are likely the setup we all are comfortable with: we ourselves
Hi Vincent,
Thanks to write this down, do you think that it is a good idea
> to make a public google calendar (or other kind of shared calendar)?
>
Let's try this out:
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/2?cid=Mjc1ODRlNDNhMjE4NDQyYWMyN2JiZDY4NTlkNWQyZTU5ZWE3NGJiMWM2Mzk4Y2VmMzNhYTcwYWYzYjZjOTc2
Thanks Christian,
On 2/13/23 7:32 AM, Christian Decker wrote:
Hi Matt,
Hi Joost,
let me chime in here, since we seem to be slowly reinventing all the
research on reputation systems that is already out there. First of all
let me say that I am personally not a fan of reputation systems in
general
Hi Matt,
Hi Joost,
let me chime in here, since we seem to be slowly reinventing all the
research on reputation systems that is already out there. First of all
let me say that I am personally not a fan of reputation systems in
general, just to get my own biases out of the way, now on to the why :-)
Hi Joost,
I’m not sure I agree that lightning is “capital efficient” (or even close to
it), but more generally I don’t see why this needs a signal.
If nodes start aggressively preferring routes through nodes that reliably route
payments (which I believe lnd already does, in effect, to some larg
Hi,
For a long time I've held the expectation that eventually payers on the
lightning network will become very strict about node performance. That they
will require a routing node to operate flawlessly or else apply a hefty
penalty such as completely avoiding the node for an extended period of tim