Re: [Lightning-dev] Resizing Lightning Channels Off-Chain With Hierarchical Channels

2023-04-03 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 12:00:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 12:41:00AM +, jlspc via Lightning-dev wrote: > > TL;DR > > Step 1: Tunable penalties; > https://github.com/JohnLaw2/ln-tunable-penalties > >

Re: [Lightning-dev] Proposed changes to the splicing specification

2023-04-03 Thread Antoine Riard
Hi Bastien, Thanks for the update on the state of splicing. > We've also discovered that implementing 0-conf splicing is tricky: you > need to be very careful about scenarios where your peer force-closes > using an *inactive* commitment that ends up double-spending what you > think is the only

Re: [Lightning-dev] Resizing Lightning Channels Off-Chain With Hierarchical Channels

2023-04-03 Thread jlspc via Lightning-dev
Hi Dave, Thank you for your clear and insightful response. Comments inline below: >Hi John, >Thank you for another innovative application of your tunable penalties. >I see two key benefits being described by your paper[1]: >- **Offchain channel resizes:** in state 0, Alice and Bob share

Re: [Lightning-dev] Resizing Lightning Channels Off-Chain With Hierarchical Channels

2023-04-03 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 12:41:00AM +, jlspc via Lightning-dev wrote: > TL;DR Even with Harding's optech write ups, and the optech space, I barely follow all this, so I'm going to try explaining it too as a way of understanding it myself; hopefully maybe that helps someone. Corrections