> [3] https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/677
> [4]
> https://github.com/renepickhardt/Automatically-Generating-a-Robust-Topology-for-the-Lightning-Network-on-top-of-Bitcoin
> [5]
> https://www.rene-pickhardt.de/improve-the-autopilot-of-bitcoins-lightning-network-summary-of-
Hi all,
I have been thinking about how we could measure the centrality of
various nodes in the LN graph and the dependence on some nodes to
route payments and to prevent network partitions. I think measuring
and tracking the changes in key metrics could help the community
decide on which nodes to
g flow algorithms for a more
> in-depth analysis of the networks graph structure?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Elias
>
> On 29 Aug 2018, at 8:40, Kulpreet Singh wrote:
>
> Hi René,
>
> Thanks for sharing the links to the issues and the excellent work you are
> doing
From my nascent understanding this will require differentiating between types
of participants.
Will the above then add complications of participant type into the protocol at
the time of creating commitments, forwarding HTLCs and also finding routes?
-kp
--- Original Message ---
On
