[Lightning-dev] Tuesday’s IRC workshop on L2 onchain support

required in advance of the possible change being made. Next week’s meeting Next week’s meeting (Tuesday 22nd June, 19:00 UTC, #l2-onchain-support, Libera) will be on fee bumping and package relay that glozow has recently been working to advance in Bitcoin Core. -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolk

Re: [Lightning-dev] Waiting SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT and Packing Packages

ol based on presigned transactions can magically >> allow dynamically adding inputs and modifying outputs for fees, and we >> also have a magic perfect transaction replacement protocol, package >> relay is still fundamentally useful for CPFP fee bumping very low >> feerate transactions received from

Re: [Lightning-dev] bLIPs: A proposal for community-driven app layer and protocol extension standardization

nto the spec. John >>>> >>> Carvalho and Bitrefill launched Turbo channels in April 2019 [2], >>>> >>> Breez posted their solution to the mailing list for feedback in August >>>> >>> 2020 [3], and we know at least ACINQ and Muun (amongst others) ha

[Lightning-dev] Last week's second IRC workshop on L2 onchain support and wrap up

seek to minimize assumptions on the base layer. -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolk...@gmail.com Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 ___ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https

Re: [Lightning-dev] Last week's second IRC workshop on L2 onchain support and wrap up

#implementation-details On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 10:44 AM Michael Folkson wrote: > > A summary of the first workshop is here: > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-June/019079.html > > The focus for this second workshop was fee bumping and package relay. > For more

Re: [Lightning-dev] v0.10.1: "eltoo: Ethereum Layer Too"

ct of this email. Is this an Ethereum project? > What exactly is Ethereum layer and how is it related to this release? > > -- > Prayank > > A3B1 E430 2298 178F > > > > ___ > Lightning-dev mailing list > Lightning-dev@lists.linu

Re: [Lightning-dev] Lightning and other layer 2 projects with multiple RBF policies

g a contrasting approach to Core is a good thing. -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 --- Original Message --- On Sunday, February 13th, 2022 at 6:09 AM, Prayank vi

[Lightning-dev] Transcript: Lightning Network in 2022 panel

in the spec (BOLT) process. Thanks Michael -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3___ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev

Re: [Lightning-dev] Lightning and other layer 2 projects with multiple RBF policies

create an artificial fee market. -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 --- Original Message --- On Monday, February 14th, 2022 at 5:18 AM, Prayank wrote: >&

Re: [Lightning-dev] LN Summit 2022 Notes & Summary/Commentary

https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/114159/how-do-the-various-lightning-implementations-treat-latency-how-long-do-they-wai -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 --- Original M

Re: [Lightning-dev] Gossip Propagation, Anti-spam, and Set Reconciliation

forwarding nodes" being used more recently on this list. [0]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21515 -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 --- Original

Re: [Lightning-dev] Three Strategies for Lightning Forwarding Nodes

Michael -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at protonmail.com Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, June 28th, 2022 at 03:34, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev wrote: > Good morning list, > > This i

Re: [Lightning-dev] Gossip Propagation, Anti-spam, and Set Reconciliation

in failed routes would be worse though. [0]: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/blob/master/07-routing-gossip.md#rationale-4 -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 ---

Re: [Lightning-dev] Unjamming lightning (new research paper)

reputation tokens that can be sold or transferred to an attacker or worse collected through gaming the system, ouch. The protocol developer has taken a problem (jamming attacks) that already exists and added an additional problem (reputation) which no doubt will be addressed by adding an addit

Re: [Lightning-dev] Mitigating Channel Jamming with Reputation Credentials: a Protocol Sketch

jor Lightning implementations, is on by default in all those Lightning implementations etc. And even if it was I would want to opt out of it. Thanks Michael [0]: https://jamming-dev.github.io/book/ -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson

Re: [Lightning-dev] Mitigating Channel Jamming with Reputation Credentials: a Protocol Sketch

://www.bitrated.com/faq -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 --- Original Message --- On Monday, November 21st, 2022 at 06:01, Antoine Riard wrote: > Hi LN D

Re: [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning

in C++ integrated with Core Lightning in C seems like the better option to me for serious running in production like use cases. -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3

[Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning

here seems to be a lull in soft fork activation chaos. Thanks Michael [0]: https://twitter.com/michaelfolkson/status/1589220155006910464?s=20=GbPm7w5BqS7rS3kiVFTNcw -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4

Re: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning

tps://bitcoincore.reviews/25038 [2]: https://bitcoincore.reviews/25038-2 [3]: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/115527/what-is-the-october-2022-bug-in-lnd-what-caused-it-and-what-would-prevent-a-sim -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolks

Re: [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning

functionality. But I think we've reached the point of no return on Core dominance and not having widely used "distros". As the ecosystem scales systems and processes should be constantly evolving and improving and to me if anything Core's seem to be going backwards. Thanks Michael -- Michael Fol

Re: [Lightning-dev] HTLC Endorsement for Jamming Mitigation

nesses in this area of reputation but it isn't a protocol/P2P gossiping issue or a "core" of a Lightning node issue. Thanks Michael [0]: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2022-November/003766.html -- Michael Folkson Email: michae

Re: [Lightning-dev] A Note on Public Communication

-dev and lightning-dev lists and just bump the number of moderators on lightning-dev. Thanks Michael -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at protonmail.com GPG: A2CF5D71603C92010659818D2A75D601B23FEE0F Learn about Bitcoin: https://www.youtube.com/@portofbitcoin --- Original Message

[Lightning-dev] Setting to_self_delay and cltv_expiry prior to channel opening

in.stackexchange.com/questions/121673/what-are-the-default-timelocks-in-lightning-implementations-today-how-are-they -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) GPG: A2CF5D71603C92010659818D2A75D601B23FEE0F Learn about Bitcoin: htt

Re: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] CheckTemplateVerify Does Not Scale Due to UTXO's Required For Fee Payment

ked states that were constructed when the market fee rate was very different from the present day's market fee rate. Thanks Michael [0]: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/117703/comparison-between-cpfp-and-bip125-for-fee-bumping -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at protonma