Re: [Lightning-dev] A Mobile Lightning User Goes to Pay a Mobile Lightning User...

2021-10-12 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
Hello Matt, can you clarify what you mean with this particular paragraph?: But for some reason those pesky users keep wanting to use lightning for > tips, or at least accept > payment on their phones without keeping them unlocked with the lightning > app open on the foreground > 24/7. So the

Re: [Lightning-dev] Removing lnd's source code from the Lightning specs repository

2021-10-10 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
Completely agree with this. How to move this forward? Set up a vote? What would be the reasoning for not moving it? On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 23:25, Fabrice Drouin wrote: > Hello, > > When you navigate to https://github.com/lightningnetwork/ you find > - the Lightning Network white paper > - the

Re: [Lightning-dev] Zero Fee Routing

2021-08-23 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
How is this related to the youtube video posted? Can you link to a specific time in it where it is discussed? On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 00:30, Daki Carnhof wrote: > This text was brought to life by repelling magnet forces of reading > ZmnSCPxj's Algorithm For Channel Fee Settings. Thank you, Zmn!

Re: [Lightning-dev] Escrow Over Lightning?

2021-02-12 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
Hey ZmnSCPxj, On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 08:52, ZmnSCPxj wrote: > Good morning Andres, > > > Hey ZmnSCPxj, > > > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 15:33, ZmnSCPxj wrote: > > > > > Good morning Andres, > > > > > > > This looks cool but would hinder UX too much for certain scenarios: > e.g. if the escrow in

Re: [Lightning-dev] Escrow Over Lightning?

2021-02-11 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
Hey ZmnSCPxj, On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 15:33, ZmnSCPxj wrote: > Good morning Andres, > > > This looks cool but would hinder UX too much for certain scenarios: e.g. > if the escrow in place is part of a bitcoin exchange, then you require the > bitcoin buyer to have bitcoin already, which makes it

Re: [Lightning-dev] Escrow Over Lightning?

2021-02-10 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
This looks cool but would hinder UX too much for certain scenarios: e.g. if the escrow in place is part of a bitcoin exchange, then you require the bitcoin buyer to have bitcoin already, which makes it harder to on-ramp new users (which could maybe only have fiat). Am I right? So are you saying

Re: [Lightning-dev] Escrow Over Lightning?

2021-02-08 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
Hey ZmnSCPxj, Am I correct in understanding that this is a proposal to change the spec (maybe add a new BOLT) so that all lightning implementations can try to support this feature. If the above is true, then I'm wondering: could a Lightning-based escrow system be implemented that doesn't require

Re: [Lightning-dev] Mitigating Channel Jamming with Stake Certificates

2020-11-27 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
Hey, On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 19:18, Bastien TEINTURIER wrote: > Good morning list, > > This is an interesting approach to solve this problem, I really like the > idea. > It definitely deserves digging more into it: the fact that it doesn't add > an additional > payment makes it largely superior

Re: [Lightning-dev] On the scalability issues of onboarding millions of LN mobile clients

2020-05-05 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
Hey Antoine, just a small note, [3] is missing in your footnotes, can you add it? Thanks On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 18:17, Antoine Riard wrote: > Hi, > > (cross-posting as it's really both layers concerned) > > Ongoing advancement of BIP 157 implementation in Core maybe the > opportunity to reflect

Re: [Lightning-dev] Data Lightning Atomic Swap (DLAS-down, DLAS-up)

2020-01-20 Thread Andrés G . Aragoneses
Hey ZmnSCPxj, On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 08:47, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev < lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Good morning Subhra, > > Refer to this protocol instead of DLAS: > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2019-June/002035.html > In this protocol, an