[Lightning-dev] Setting to_self_delay and cltv_expiry prior to channel opening

[0]: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/121673/what-are-the-default-timelocks-in-lightning-implementations-today-how-are-they -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) GPG: A2CF5D71603C92010659818D2A75D601B23FEE0F Lear

Re: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] CheckTemplateVerify Does Not Scale Due to UTXO's Required For Fee Payment

ransactions for revoked states that were constructed when the market fee rate was very different from the present day's market fee rate. Thanks Michael [0]: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/117703/comparison-between-cpfp-and-bip125-for-fee-bumping -- Michael Folkson Email: m

Re: [Lightning-dev] HTLC Endorsement for Jamming Mitigation

e interesting projects, services or even businesses in this area of reputation but it isn't a protocol/P2P gossiping issue or a "core" of a Lightning node issue. Thanks Michael [0]: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2022-Nove

Re: [Lightning-dev] A Note on Public Communication

-dev and lightning-dev lists and just bump the number of moderators on lightning-dev. Thanks Michael -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at protonmail.com GPG: A2CF5D71603C92010659818D2A75D601B23FEE0F Learn about Bitcoin: https://www.youtube.com/@portofbitcoin --- Original Message

Re: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning

e-current-status-of-the-bip-125-replacement-the-v3-policy [1]: https://bitcoincore.reviews/25038 [2]: https://bitcoincore.reviews/25038-2 [3]: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/115527/what-is-the-october-2022-bug-in-lnd-what-caused-it-and-what-would-prevent-a-sim -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson

Re: [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning

ited additional functionality. But I think we've reached the point of no return on Core dominance and not having widely used "distros". As the ecosystem scales systems and processes should be constantly evolving and improving and to me if anything Core's seem to be going backwards. Thank

Re: [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning

rk of Core in C++ integrated with Core Lightning in C seems like the better option to me for serious running in production like use cases. -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159

[Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning

n (thankfully) there seems to be a lull in soft fork activation chaos. Thanks Michael [0]: https://twitter.com/michaelfolkson/status/1589220155006910464?s=20&t=GbPm7w5BqS7rS3kiVFTNcw -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson

Re: [Lightning-dev] Unjamming lightning (new research paper)

e pushed to the user. But protocol reputation tokens that can be sold or transferred to an attacker or worse collected through gaming the system, ouch. The protocol developer has taken a problem (jamming attacks) that already exists and added an additional problem (reputation) which no doubt wi

Re: [Lightning-dev] Mitigating Channel Jamming with Reputation Credentials: a Protocol Sketch

ver part of the protocol, is used by all of the major Lightning implementations, is on by default in all those Lightning implementations etc. And even if it was I would want to opt out of it. Thanks Michael [0]: https://jamming-dev.github.io/book/ -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [pro

Re: [Lightning-dev] Mitigating Channel Jamming with Reputation Credentials: a Protocol Sketch

utation-in-openbazaar-1a577fac5175 [2]: https://www.bitrated.com/faq -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 --- Original Message --- On Monday, November 21st, 2022 a

Re: [Lightning-dev] Gossip Propagation, Anti-spam, and Set Reconciliation

tential uptick in failed routes would be worse though. [0]: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/blob/master/07-routing-gossip.md#rationale-4 -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214

Re: [Lightning-dev] Gossip Propagation, Anti-spam, and Set Reconciliation

s" as "forwarding nodes" now? I've noticed "forwarding nodes" being used more recently on this list. [0]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21515 -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP

Re: [Lightning-dev] Three Strategies for Lightning Forwarding Nodes

Michael -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at protonmail.com Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, June 28th, 2022 at 03:34, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev wrote: > Good morning list, > > This i

Re: [Lightning-dev] LN Summit 2022 Notes & Summary/Commentary

norr-multisig/ [1]: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/114159/how-do-the-various-lightning-implementations-treat-latency-how-long-do-they-wai -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3

[Lightning-dev] Transcript: Lightning Network in 2022 panel

ns in the spec (BOLT) process. Thanks Michael -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3___ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightnin

Re: [Lightning-dev] Lightning and other layer 2 projects with multiple RBF policies

sizes and create an artificial fee market. -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 --- Original Message --- On Monday, February 14th, 2022 at 5:18 AM, Prayank wro

Re: [Lightning-dev] Lightning and other layer 2 projects with multiple RBF policies

implementation taking a contrasting approach to Core is a good thing. -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolkson at [protonmail.com](http://protonmail.com/) Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 --- Original Message --- On Sunday, February 13th, 20

Re: [Lightning-dev] v0.10.1: "eltoo: Ethereum Layer Too"

sed about the subject of this email. Is this an Ethereum project? > What exactly is Ethereum layer and how is it related to this release? > > -- > Prayank > > A3B1 E430 2298 178F > > > > ___ > Lightning-dev mailing list >

Re: [Lightning-dev] Last week's second IRC workshop on L2 onchain support and wrap up

-0125.mediawiki#implementation-details On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 10:44 AM Michael Folkson wrote: > > A summary of the first workshop is here: > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-June/019079.html > > The focus for this second workshop was fee bumping and package relay.

Re: [Lightning-dev] bLIPs: A proposal for community-driven app layer and protocol extension standardization

t;> >>> opportunity to discuss how the BOLT process handles features and best >>>> >>> practices that arise in the wild vs. originating within the process >>>> >>> itself. Zero-conf channels are one of many LN innovations on the app >>>> >>

[Lightning-dev] Last week's second IRC workshop on L2 onchain support and wrap up

seek to minimize assumptions on the base layer. -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolk...@gmail.com Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 ___ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https

Re: [Lightning-dev] Waiting SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT and Packing Packages

>> someone to write up this anyprevout idea in more detail and distribute >> it before you promote it much more. >> >> > package-relay sounds a reasonable, temporary "patch". >> >> Even if every protocol based on presigned transactions can magically >> allow dynamicall

[Lightning-dev] Tuesday’s IRC workshop on L2 onchain support

required in advance of the possible change being made. Next week’s meeting Next week’s meeting (Tuesday 22nd June, 19:00 UTC, #l2-onchain-support, Libera) will be on fee bumping and package relay that glozow has recently been working to advance in Bitcoin Core. -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolk

Re: [Lightning-dev] Arbitrary Bitcoin Contracts over LN

ONEY. > 3. Symmetrical chains of transactions, different for both parties, > instead of a single chain. > > In addition, arbitrary contracts are not really particularly useful. > HTLCs seem to me an important building block for digital value transfers, > and they (and their equival