Hello Stefan, hello Lightning Devs,
> As to Martin's approximation research, I have asked myself similar
>
> questions. Unfortunately, the paper you cite is paywalled and not
>
> available at sci-hub, so I haven't read it.
Sorry for the paywalled link, without paywall you can read the article on
Good morning everyone,
with regards to zerobasefee, I think that the argument that HTLCs are
costly doesn't quite hold up because they are always free to an
attacker as it stands. However, I fully agree with Zmn's opinion that
it's not necessary to bang our head against any opposition to this
Dear Carsten, Rene and fellow lightning developers,
Regarding the approximation quality of the minimum convex cost flow formulation
for multi-part payments on the lightning network [1] and Carsten's discussion
points on Twitter [2] and on the mailing list:
> 8) Quality of Approximation
>
>
Good morning Rene, sorry for the lateness,
> Last but not least, please allow me to make a short remark on the (still to
> me very surprisingly controversial) base fee discussion: For simplicity I did
> not include any fee considerations to the published code (besides a fee
> report on how
Dear Carsten and fellow lightning developers,
thanks for going into such detail and discovering some of the minor
inaccuracies of my very rough piecewise linearization!
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 1:53 PM Carsten Otto wrote:
> 1.2) The Mission Control information provided by lnd [...]
> > I think
Hi Rene,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:56:24PM +0100, René Pickhardt via Lightning-dev
wrote:
> > 1) What's the reasoning behind combining parallel channels?
> I think that should work and especially when including fees to the
> cost function and considering how nodes handle routing requests on
>
Dear Carsten, Martin and fellow lightning developers,
first of all thank you very much for independently verifying and
acknowledging my recent findings about the runtime of finding a pieceweise
linearized approximation to the min cost flow problem, for working on
integrating them into lnd-manageJ
Dear Lightning Developer, Rene & Carsten,
The min-cost flow formulation for MPP of Rene and Stefan [1] intrigued me and
brought me to think about how this optimization problem can be solved
efficiently in order to contribute to practically relevant reliable payments on
the Lightning network.
Hi Rene,
thanks a lot for your contribution! This is exactly what I needed to
start coding again :) I intend to release a somewhat usable version of
your approach in lnd-manageJ [1] soon. Preliminary results indicate that
results (i.e. MPPs to try) can be computed in less than a second, which
is
Dear fellow Lightning Developers,
I am pleased (and a bit proud) to be able to inform you that I finally
found a quick way to approximate the slow minimum convex cost flow
computation. This is necessary for optimally reliable and cheap payment
flows [0] to deliver large multi part payments over
10 matches
Mail list logo