Re: [Lightning-dev] [Question] Unilateral closing during fee increase.

2018-01-16 Thread Johan TorĂ¥s Halseth
Hi Jonathan, This is definitely a problem! I have a mainnet channel I force closed 2 weeks ago that is still not mined :( With current spec I guess it is not much that can be done other than crossing fingers. For future specs maybe someone could come up with some SIGHASH flag magic to either

Re: [Lightning-dev] [Question] Unilateral closing during fee increase.

2018-01-14 Thread Richard
Complete n00b question here: if one side of the channel have 100% of the funds, can the last message give that user complete controll over the channel (to close it "unilateral" without any interaction from the other side? And that way change the fee size when that part want's to close the

Re: [Lightning-dev] [Question] Unilateral closing during fee increase.

2018-01-14 Thread Peter Todd
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:30:28AM +0900, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > Hey everybody. > > Say that the last time we updated channel state, we assumed 40 satoshi/byte > was enough to get confirmed, then I leave the channel for a few weeks, come > back to find my partner fell off the face of the

[Lightning-dev] [Question] Unilateral closing during fee increase.

2018-01-13 Thread Jonathan Underwood
Hey everybody. Say that the last time we updated channel state, we assumed 40 satoshi/byte was enough to get confirmed, then I leave the channel for a few weeks, come back to find my partner fell off the face of the internet. I perform unilateral close with my output on CSV timelock... but it