Hi Laolu,
Thanks for your detailed and interesting reply. Please see below some
points I would like to make in some of your comments and the answers to
your questions in the last email. And of course, I would be happy to
further discuss with you.
On 11/25/17 2:16 PM, Olaoluwa Osuntokun wrote:
>
Olaoluwa Osuntokun writes:
> (re-sending as doesn't look like my original mail went through to the list?)
I increased the limit to 80k now.
Cheers,
Rusty.
___
Lightning-dev mailing list
Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Hi Pedro,
I came across this paper a few weeks ago, skimmed it lightly, and noted a
few interesting aspects I wanted to dig into later. Your email reminded me
to re-read the paper, so thanks for that! Before reading the paper, I
wasn't aware of the concept of coordinate embedding, nor how that
Hello,
I am in the process of studying your routing approach and a doubt arised
related to the privacy of payments.
The current LN accomplishes payments thorugh onion-like packets which do
not reveil the path, but just previous and next hops.
Your approach also aims at obfuscating the path. What
Thanks Pedro for the paper, I'll read through it as soon as possible and
add more feedback :-) I just have some minor points to add regarding
your last mail.
> The onion-like packets used for *payments* in the current LN
> implementations inevitably assume that the sender knows the complete
>
Hello Giovanni,
thanks for you interest in our work.
The onion-like packets used for *payments* in the current LN
implementations inevitably assume that the sender knows the complete
path from the sender to the intended receiver. The question/challenge
that we are solving in this work is: how
Hello,
my name is Pedro Moreno-Sanchez and I am a PhD student at the computer
science department at Purdue. I would like to bring to your attention a
novel routing algorithm suitable for the Lightning Network (LN) that I
have been working on with my supervisor Prof. Aniket Kate (Purdue
Hi Christian,
Are there any open source simulators available for trying different routing
strategies? Or even a simulator for the Lightning network as a whole?
Regards
sarva
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Christian Decker <
decker.christ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh yeah, my mail tool
Thanks for the links!
And just to clarify, my other comments relate to cryptographic conservatism
in general, and not specifically to routing. I switched topics, sorry for
the confusion.
On Nov 17, 2017 9:30 AM, "Christian Decker"
wrote:
> Oh yeah, my mail tool
Oh yeah, my mail tool destroyed that mail quite expertly :-)
The footnotes were
[1]
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/blob/master/07-routing-gossip.md
[2]
https://medium.com/@rusty_lightning/lightning-routing-rough-background-dbac930abbad
[3]
"I think this is exactly the right venue to discuss these kinds of
issue..." - you are probably right! My bad.
Christian, thank you for your knowledgable reply. The footnotes did not
come through on my end, I am especially interested in [3]. Do you have a
link? I am thrilled to hear of a
I came across a thread discussing lightning network on reddit. A comment
was stating there is an unresolvable issue with the concept of lightning
network, related to routing. Quoting the comment:
"The problem is, actually scaling and preventing decentralization requires
far more than a nice UX
12 matches
Mail list logo