igate the problem. Please, find my argument at the bottom of [1].
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/677
>>
>> Best,
>> Dmytro
>>
>> From: Olaoluwa Osuntokun
>> Date: Tuesday, 3 July 2018 at 22:13
>> To: Dmytro Piatkivsk
o: Dmytro Piatkivskyi
Cc: "lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
Subject: Re: [Lightning-dev] Rebalancing argument
Hi Dmytro,
Thanks for bringing this up! Sometime last year when I was at a developer
meetup that cdecker also attended, we briefly discussed a similar
question.
he bottom of [1].
[1] https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/677
Best,
Dmytro
From: Olaoluwa Osuntokun
Date: Tuesday, 3 July 2018 at 22:13
To: Dmytro Piatkivskyi
Cc: "lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
Subject: Re: [Lightning-dev] Rebalancing argument
Hi Dmytro
e question remains — are there obvious advantages of cycle
> transactions over a smart fee/routing system? In any sense. Path lengths,
> for example. To answer that I am going to run a simulation, but also would
> appreciate your opinions.
>
> Best,
> Dmytro
>
> From: René Pick
Hi everyone,
I have been working academically on the Lightning network for a while now. I
didn't not participate in the list to form my own vision of what it should be.
So please, bear with me if I'll be saying nonsense sometimes.
There has been a lot of discussion on sending cycle
