Good morning Robert,
> > This shows the issue: what they measured was *the number of rat tails
> > shown*, not *the reduction of rats in the city*, and so they got shown a
> > lot of rat tails (at the expense of actively increasing the number of rats
> > in the city, since they were now being
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:11 AM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning Robert,
>
> > How did you know that I'm a closet furry?! ;) I'm shaking in my
> onesie right now...
>
> It was so obvious, my furdar was picking up your furriness just from
> parsing the individual bytes arising from your email
Good morning Robert,
> How did you know that I'm a closet furry?! ;) I'm shaking in my onesie right
> now...
It was so obvious, my furdar was picking up your furriness just from parsing
the individual bytes arising from your email server.
> It is definitely not my goal to split the network up
Hello ZmnSCPxj,
How did you know that I'm a closet furry?! ;) I'm shaking in my
onesie right now...
It is definitely not my goal to split the network up but rather to provide
some guide rails to help ensure usability and decentralization. I also
agree 100% that Tor nodes are a must for LN.
In
Good morning Robert,
Unfortunately, this proposal is basically a proposal to split the network into
a central network of specially-chosen nodes surrounded by second-class and
third-class nodes that are utterly dependent on the central network, which I
personally find disturbing.
Of course, it
Superbolt Proposal
*Introduction*
Currently, the LN user experience is far from retail ready.
Inbound/outbound channel liquidity issues and node dropouts mean that many
payment attempts will not succeed.
I have spent some time thinking through these issues and believe a BOLT
specification which
