Re: [Lightning-dev] bLIPs: A proposal for community-driven app layer and protocol extension stand

2021-07-02 Thread fiatjaf
If the BIPs can allow very small standards related to a small niche of Lightning usage, then I think they are the place for everything indeed. I'm convinced. Thinking about proposing the LNURL specs as BIPs now, but then I don't know if it will be weird for them to exist alone there, without the

Re: [Lightning-dev] bLIPs: A proposal for community-driven app layer and protocol extension stand

2021-07-02 Thread Luke Dashjr
Yes, many systems doesn't really make sense. We can add editors and revise the BIP process as needed (BOLTs might prefer to use markdown?). Even aside from Lightning BIPs, there are several improvements that can be made, so it makes sense to address everything at once.

Re: [Lightning-dev] bLIPs: A proposal for community-driven app layer and protocol extension stand

2021-07-02 Thread Dan Gershony
Hi, There will be many layer 2 (and probably layer 3) protocols (BOLT, RGB, Volts etc...) does it really make sense to merge them all into the BIPs system? On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 10:03 AM nathanael via Lightning-dev < lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Michael Folkson wrote: >

Re: [Lightning-dev] bLIPs: A proposal for community-driven app layer and protocol extension stand

2021-07-02 Thread nathanael via Lightning-dev
Michael Folkson wrote: > > Adding a third BIP editor more involved with Lightning sounds like a good > > idea. > > Or alternatively if BOLTs were subsumed into BIPs I think Bastien > would be a great additional BIP editor to cover Lightning related BIPs > :) I think BOLTs being subsumed into