Hi Pierre and list folks, I haven't looked at the technical implications of implementing this in detail, but I like the high-level direction this proposal is taking :) I think it nicely ties together several concepts that have been proposed earlier, and with the correct design could give the
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, 05:42 ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev < firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > Good morning Pierre and list, > > > There is another unrelated issue: because trampoline nodes don't know > > anything about what happened before they received the onion, they may > >
Hello ZmnSCPxj, > Do you refer to the changing from "H"TLC to "P"TLC point-locked timelocked > contracts? > i.e. instead of payment hash / preimage, we use payment point / scalar. Yes, that is what I meant. Cryptography isn't my strong suit though, so I'm not able to go into much more details.
> This is not an issue. Like we discussed for the multi-part payments the HTLCs > still resolve correctly Right! Great, missed that ___ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightningemail@example.com