Re: [Lightning-dev] An Argument For Single-Asset Lightning Network

2018-12-27 Thread Alexander Leishman
Hello ZmnSCPxj, > Do you mean, that if you make a swap on Lightning, which *might* be a Bitcoin-to-WJT American Call Option, I will refuse to forward until I also get something that is a WJT-to-Bitcoin call option, similar to a butterfly spread? > That implies that in the "normal",

Re: [Lightning-dev] An Argument For Single-Asset Lightning Network

2018-12-27 Thread Alexander Leishman
There’s another potential partial solution here if we can create some cryptographic protocol for atomically swapping information. This would be used to swap the final HTLC sig for the hash preimage, preventing the optionality issue. This idea was inspired by a paper called “Timed Commitments”