Re: [Lightning-dev] Proposal for Advertising Lightning nodes via DNS records.

2018-04-20 Thread Tyler H
Great points. IsStandard() is something I hadn't considered yet, but I think miners are incentivized to want Numerifides transactions as a registration will need a solid miners fee, and "revoked" names will cause escalating fee wars that the miners can just soak up. I think a standard that uses m

Re: [Lightning-dev] Proposal for Advertising Lightning nodes via DNS records.

2018-04-20 Thread ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev
Good morning Tyler, > Great points. IsStandard() is something I hadn't considered yet, but I think > miners are incentivized to want Numerifides transactions as a registration > will need a solid miners fee, and "revoked" names will cause escalating fee > wars that the miners can just soak up.

Re: [Lightning-dev] Towards a gridlike Lightning Network

2018-04-20 Thread Benjamin Mord
Good afternoon ZmnSCPxj, "I do not see a bloom filter?" Well, if you look at it kinda sideways, you are using a bloom filter in your March 23rd proposal. As originally defined, I think the "false positives" in bloom filtering were the unfortunate cost of performance. In BIP 37, the false positive