Re: [Lightning-dev] An Argument For Single-Asset Lightning Network

2019-01-05 Thread Lloyd Fournier
Hi David and ZmnSCPxj, ZmnSCPxj, Thanks for your response. I messed something up with my response so my original post didn't get into the archive. I put it in a gist: https://gist.github.com/LLFourn/d0afa6b37207aed7cd73f6b9203c0def for reference. > I agree. > When I was developing American Call

Re: [Lightning-dev] An Argument For Single-Asset Lightning Network

2019-01-05 Thread David A. Harding
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 07:01:18AM +, ZmnSCPxj wrote: > Good morning David, > > What happens if the exchange node only sends its preimage towards the > payer and not towards the payee? > > If the payer and payee do not coordinate, then it becomes possible for > the exchange node to take the f

Re: [Lightning-dev] An Argument For Single-Asset Lightning Network

2019-01-05 Thread ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev
Good morning Lloyd, > > I agree. > > When I was developing American Call Options on top of onchain HTLCs, I came > > up with a similar construction for ensuring that the premium is paid before > > the HTLCs setting up the option appear onchain. > > I would be interested to see how your constructi