Good morning ZmnSCPxj, thanks for the response.
> I would be hesitant to divide the world in such manner.
> I understand that in typical computer science, splitting your objects up into
> smaller parts is a long-accepted method of doing things.
> However, when it comes to finances and
I think we should not try to recover from a node not finding the next
hop in the trampoline, and rather expect trampolines to have reasonable
uptime (required anyway) and have an up to date routing table (that's
what we're paying them for after all).
So I'd rather propose reusing
Good morning Christian,
> Like mentioned above the entire job of trampolines is to provide base
> routing capability, and we should not make special provisions for myopic
> trampoline nodes, since routing is their entire reason for existence :-)
The point of providing this special