Hi Matt,
If nodes start aggressively preferring routes through nodes that reliably
> route payments (which I believe lnd already does, in effect, to some large
> extent), they should do so by measurement, not signaling.
>
The signaling is intended as a way to make measurement more efficient. If
Hi Christian,
> And after all this rambling, let's get back to the topic at hand: I
> don't think enshrining the differences of availability in the protocol,
> thus creating two classes of nodes, is a desirable
> feature.
Yes so to be clear, the HA signaling is not on the node level but on the
On 2/14/23 1:42 PM, Antoine Riard wrote:
Hi Joost,
> I think movement in this direction is important to guarantee competitiveness with centralised
payment systems and their (at least theoretical) ability to
> process a payment in the blink of an eye. A lightning wallet trying multiple
>
> But how do you decide to set it without a credit relationship? Do I
> measure my channel and set the
>
bit because the channel is "usually" (at what threshold?) saturating in the
> inbound direction? What
> happens if this changes for an hour and I get unlucky? Did I just screw
> myself?
>
As
On 2/13/23 7:05 PM, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
Good morning all,
First of all let's see what types of reputation system exist (and yes,
this is my very informal categorization):
- First hand experience
- Inferred experience
- Hearsay
The first two are likely the setup we all are comfortable with: we
On 2/14/23 2:34 AM, Joost Jager wrote:
Hi Matt,
If nodes start aggressively preferring routes through nodes that reliably
route payments (which
I believe lnd already does, in effect, to some large extent), they should
do so by measurement,
not signaling.
The signaling is
Hi Joost,
> For a long time I've held the expectation that eventually payers on the
lightning network will become very strict about node performance. That they
will > require a routing node to operate flawlessly or else apply a hefty
penalty such as completely avoiding the node for an extended
