I can confirm the bug oon version 2.19.48. The workaround still works fine.
---
** [issues:#794] Arrow head upsets short arpeggios**
**Status:** Accepted
**Created:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 08:27 AM UTC by Anonymous
**Last Updated:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 08:27 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
**Attachments:**
-
[arrow_heads.png](https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/794/attachment/arrow_heads.png)
(5.4 kB; image/png)
*Originally created by:* *anonymous
*Originally created by:* [v.villenave](http://code.google.com/u/v.villenave/)
*Originally owned by:* [v.villenave](http://code.google.com/u/v.villenave/)
% New report from Robin Bannister:
% Although short arpeggios are generally correctly printed, when an arrow
% is specified it upsets the arpeggio's placement.
% It looks like ly:arpeggio::print is careless at heads\[dir\] -=
\version "2.12.1" %reproduced with 2.13.3
workaround = \override Arpeggio \#'positions =
\#\(lambda \(grob\) \(interval-widen \(ly:arpeggio::calc-positions grob\)
0.5\)\)
\{
\override Arpeggio \#'arpeggio-direction = \#DOWN
<c' g'>4 \arpeggio <c' f'>4 \arpeggio
% \workaround
<c' e'>4 \arpeggio <c' d'>4 \arpeggio % arrow too long for one wiggle
\}
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
