[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #4997 Add Preinit class for early initialization

2016-12-01 Thread Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues
- **status**: Fixed --> Verified



---

** [issues:#4997] Add Preinit class for early initialization**

**Status:** Verified
**Labels:** FIxed_2_19_51 
**Created:** Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:03 PM UTC by David Kastrup
**Last Updated:** Sat Nov 19, 2016 01:23 PM UTC
**Owner:** David Kastrup


Add Preinit class for early initialization

This patch series may well be incomplete: strictly speaking, it might
be needed with Guile 1.8 already to ensure parts of derived classes
are not being scanned and interpreted by the mark_smob hooks before
they are initialized.  However, the semi-asynchronous nature of
Guile 2.0 makes this situation more troubling.

I don't have positive proof that this code avoids actual crashes in
the context of either Guile 1.8 or Guile 2.0.  While the
implementation is rather simple (and cannot be made much more
complicated since it has to work with objects in seriously incomplete
form), its necessity is headache-inducing.  But if its necessity turns
out to be of more than theoretical nature, I'd rather have it in the
code base sooner than later.  Probably some other derived classes than
those addressed in the followup patches should get the same treatment.

Here is the commit message for the first patch of the series, followed
by the others:


This is a tricky thing: once a base class calls smobify_self () in
its constructor, further allocations during construction of base
class and derived classes might lead to mark_smob calls on the
object under construction.  When those call a virtual function like
derived_mark, the virtual function corresponding to the
incompletely initialized object is likely to be called.

This situation is acerbated in Guile 2.0 where the mark passes may occur
with only loose synchronization to the allocations.

The order of initialization of an object consists in calling the
constructors of virtual base classes, then of non-virtual base
classes, then initializing all data members.

As a result, the derived constructor comes too late for
initialization.  That's where the Preinit template class comes in.
Derive from it _before_ deriving from the smobifying base class
providing derived_mark, and it will call its Base class' pre_init
function (which must not rely on the instantiation being complete).

The pre_init function should then put the derived class into a state
_before_ its constructor or a constructor of its data members is being
called where it's safe to call its derived_mark function.  Note that in
particular that most STL data structures are in undefined state before
their constructor is being called, so the pre_init function has to
establish a state where derived_mark will not attempt to interpret data
members of types like std::vector which may not have been constructed
yet.





Use Preinit for Global_context, protect output definition


Use Preinit for font metrics


Use Preinit in Engraver_group


Use Preinit in Spanner


Use Preinit in Music


Use Preinit class in Scheme_engraver

This avoids calls of derived_mark on uninitialized data.  Fold
Scheme_engraver::init_from_scheme (SCM) into converting constructor
since it has become identical to it.

http://codereview.appspot.com/316890043


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options.  Or, if this is 
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto


[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #4997 Add Preinit class for early initialization

2016-11-19 Thread Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues
- **labels**:  --> FIxed_2_19_51
- **status**: Started --> Fixed
- **Patch**: push -->  
- **Comment**:

author  David Kastrup 
Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:09:08 + (14:09 +0200)
committer   David Kastrup 
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:49:58 + (21:49 +0100)
commit  0943e805fa82ebeb1d1ed32e675070467e340c39



author  David Kastrup 
Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:11:31 + (14:11 +0200)
committer   David Kastrup 
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:49:58 + (21:49 +0100)
commit  6f5133448f7f6daf27191f12b411c70942751b50



author  David Kastrup 
Sat, 4 Jun 2016 15:41:05 + (17:41 +0200)
committer   David Kastrup 
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:49:58 + (21:49 +0100)
commit  402fcf51e5a567209b0293ef4e387315a8c5c2a4



author  David Kastrup 
Sat, 4 Jun 2016 15:41:23 + (17:41 +0200)
committer   David Kastrup 
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:49:58 + (21:49 +0100)
commit  2df973cc940e9bf1862579a80a2f94a009c8f621



author  David Kastrup 
Sat, 4 Jun 2016 16:13:13 + (18:13 +0200)
committer   David Kastrup 
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:49:58 + (21:49 +0100)
commit  b6ab7b0d552591f2039fd2c83c3566d7c2ce5d37



author  David Kastrup 
Sat, 4 Jun 2016 17:00:16 + (19:00 +0200)
committer   David Kastrup 
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:49:58 + (21:49 +0100)
commit  3cdc909d8cea64c8faef90d3a6a391f32a424ba2



author  David Kastrup 
Sat, 4 Jun 2016 17:31:31 + (19:31 +0200)
committer   David Kastrup 
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:49:58 + (21:49 +0100)
commit  b0dce4ca74c6ebf43a3f574ccf281b8bc58a3b75




---

** [issues:#4997] Add Preinit class for early initialization**

**Status:** Fixed
**Labels:** FIxed_2_19_51 
**Created:** Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:03 PM UTC by David Kastrup
**Last Updated:** Fri Nov 18, 2016 07:58 PM UTC
**Owner:** David Kastrup


Add Preinit class for early initialization

This patch series may well be incomplete: strictly speaking, it might
be needed with Guile 1.8 already to ensure parts of derived classes
are not being scanned and interpreted by the mark_smob hooks before
they are initialized.  However, the semi-asynchronous nature of
Guile 2.0 makes this situation more troubling.

I don't have positive proof that this code avoids actual crashes in
the context of either Guile 1.8 or Guile 2.0.  While the
implementation is rather simple (and cannot be made much more
complicated since it has to work with objects in seriously incomplete
form), its necessity is headache-inducing.  But if its necessity turns
out to be of more than theoretical nature, I'd rather have it in the
code base sooner than later.  Probably some other derived classes than
those addressed in the followup patches should get the same treatment.

Here is the commit message for the first patch of the series, followed
by the others:


This is a tricky thing: once a base class calls smobify_self () in
its constructor, further allocations during construction of base
class and derived classes might lead to mark_smob calls on the
object under construction.  When those call a virtual function like
derived_mark, the virtual function corresponding to the
incompletely initialized object is likely to be called.

This situation is acerbated in Guile 2.0 where the mark passes may occur
with only loose synchronization to the allocations.

The order of initialization of an object consists in calling the
constructors of virtual base classes, then of non-virtual base
classes, then initializing all data members.

As a result, the derived constructor comes too late for
initialization.  That's where the Preinit template class comes in.
Derive from it _before_ deriving from the smobifying base class
providing derived_mark, and it will call its Base class' pre_init
function (which must not rely on the instantiation being complete).

The pre_init function should then put the derived class into a state
_before_ its constructor or a constructor of its data members is being
called where it's safe to call its derived_mark function.  Note that in
particular that most STL data structures are in undefined state before
their constructor is being called, so the pre_init function has to
establish a state where derived_mark will not attempt to interpret data
members of types like std::vector which may not have been constructed
yet.





Use Preinit for Global_context, protect output definition


Use Preinit for font metrics


Use Preinit in Engraver_group


Use Preinit in Spanner


Use Preinit in Music


Use Preinit class in Scheme_engraver

This avoids calls of derived_mark on uninitialized data.  Fold
Scheme_engraver::init_from_scheme (SCM) into converting constructor
since it has become identical to it.

http://codereview.appspot.com/316890043


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, 

[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #4997 Add Preinit class for early initialization

2016-11-18 Thread Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues
- **Patch**: countdown --> push
- **Comment**:

Patch counted down - please push



---

** [issues:#4997] Add Preinit class for early initialization**

**Status:** Started
**Created:** Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:03 PM UTC by David Kastrup
**Last Updated:** Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:27 AM UTC
**Owner:** David Kastrup


Add Preinit class for early initialization

This patch series may well be incomplete: strictly speaking, it might
be needed with Guile 1.8 already to ensure parts of derived classes
are not being scanned and interpreted by the mark_smob hooks before
they are initialized.  However, the semi-asynchronous nature of
Guile 2.0 makes this situation more troubling.

I don't have positive proof that this code avoids actual crashes in
the context of either Guile 1.8 or Guile 2.0.  While the
implementation is rather simple (and cannot be made much more
complicated since it has to work with objects in seriously incomplete
form), its necessity is headache-inducing.  But if its necessity turns
out to be of more than theoretical nature, I'd rather have it in the
code base sooner than later.  Probably some other derived classes than
those addressed in the followup patches should get the same treatment.

Here is the commit message for the first patch of the series, followed
by the others:


This is a tricky thing: once a base class calls smobify_self () in
its constructor, further allocations during construction of base
class and derived classes might lead to mark_smob calls on the
object under construction.  When those call a virtual function like
derived_mark, the virtual function corresponding to the
incompletely initialized object is likely to be called.

This situation is acerbated in Guile 2.0 where the mark passes may occur
with only loose synchronization to the allocations.

The order of initialization of an object consists in calling the
constructors of virtual base classes, then of non-virtual base
classes, then initializing all data members.

As a result, the derived constructor comes too late for
initialization.  That's where the Preinit template class comes in.
Derive from it _before_ deriving from the smobifying base class
providing derived_mark, and it will call its Base class' pre_init
function (which must not rely on the instantiation being complete).

The pre_init function should then put the derived class into a state
_before_ its constructor or a constructor of its data members is being
called where it's safe to call its derived_mark function.  Note that in
particular that most STL data structures are in undefined state before
their constructor is being called, so the pre_init function has to
establish a state where derived_mark will not attempt to interpret data
members of types like std::vector which may not have been constructed
yet.





Use Preinit for Global_context, protect output definition


Use Preinit for font metrics


Use Preinit in Engraver_group


Use Preinit in Spanner


Use Preinit in Music


Use Preinit class in Scheme_engraver

This avoids calls of derived_mark on uninitialized data.  Fold
Scheme_engraver::init_from_scheme (SCM) into converting constructor
since it has become identical to it.

http://codereview.appspot.com/316890043


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options.  Or, if this is 
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.--
___
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto


[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #4997 Add Preinit class for early initialization

2016-11-15 Thread Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues
- Description has changed:

Diff:







- **Needs**:  -->  
- **Patch**: new --> countdown
- **Comment**:

Passes make, make check and a full make doc.



---

** [issues:#4997] Add Preinit class for early initialization**

**Status:** Started
**Created:** Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:03 PM UTC by David Kastrup
**Last Updated:** Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:03 PM UTC
**Owner:** David Kastrup


Add Preinit class for early initialization

This patch series may well be incomplete: strictly speaking, it might
be needed with Guile 1.8 already to ensure parts of derived classes
are not being scanned and interpreted by the mark_smob hooks before
they are initialized.  However, the semi-asynchronous nature of
Guile 2.0 makes this situation more troubling.

I don't have positive proof that this code avoids actual crashes in
the context of either Guile 1.8 or Guile 2.0.  While the
implementation is rather simple (and cannot be made much more
complicated since it has to work with objects in seriously incomplete
form), its necessity is headache-inducing.  But if its necessity turns
out to be of more than theoretical nature, I'd rather have it in the
code base sooner than later.  Probably some other derived classes than
those addressed in the followup patches should get the same treatment.

Here is the commit message for the first patch of the series, followed
by the others:


This is a tricky thing: once a base class calls smobify_self () in
its constructor, further allocations during construction of base
class and derived classes might lead to mark_smob calls on the
object under construction.  When those call a virtual function like
derived_mark, the virtual function corresponding to the
incompletely initialized object is likely to be called.

This situation is acerbated in Guile 2.0 where the mark passes may occur
with only loose synchronization to the allocations.

The order of initialization of an object consists in calling the
constructors of virtual base classes, then of non-virtual base
classes, then initializing all data members.

As a result, the derived constructor comes too late for
initialization.  That's where the Preinit template class comes in.
Derive from it _before_ deriving from the smobifying base class
providing derived_mark, and it will call its Base class' pre_init
function (which must not rely on the instantiation being complete).

The pre_init function should then put the derived class into a state
_before_ its constructor or a constructor of its data members is being
called where it's safe to call its derived_mark function.  Note that in
particular that most STL data structures are in undefined state before
their constructor is being called, so the pre_init function has to
establish a state where derived_mark will not attempt to interpret data
members of types like std::vector which may not have been constructed
yet.





Use Preinit for Global_context, protect output definition


Use Preinit for font metrics


Use Preinit in Engraver_group


Use Preinit in Spanner


Use Preinit in Music


Use Preinit class in Scheme_engraver

This avoids calls of derived_mark on uninitialized data.  Fold
Scheme_engraver::init_from_scheme (SCM) into converting constructor
since it has become identical to it.

http://codereview.appspot.com/316890043


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options.  Or, if this is 
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.--
___
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto


[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #4997 Add Preinit class for early initialization

2016-11-12 Thread Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues



---

** [issues:#4997] Add Preinit class for early initialization**

**Status:** Started
**Created:** Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:03 PM UTC by David Kastrup
**Last Updated:** Sat Nov 12, 2016 10:03 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody


Add Preinit class for early initialization

This patch series may well be incomplete: strictly speaking, it might
be needed with Guile 1.8 already to ensure parts of derived classes
are not being scanned and interpreted by the mark_smob hooks before
they are initialized.  However, the semi-asynchronous nature of
Guile 2.0 makes this situation more troubling.

I don't have positive proof that this code avoids actual crashes in
the context of either Guile 1.8 or Guile 2.0.  While the
implementation is rather simple (and cannot be made much more
complicated since it has to work with objects in seriously incomplete
form), its necessity is headache-inducing.  But if its necessity turns
out to be of more than theoretical nature, I'd rather have it in the
code base sooner than later.  Probably some other derived classes than
those addressed in the followup patches should get the same treatment.

Here is the commit message for the first patch of the series, followed
by the others:


This is a tricky thing: once a base class calls smobify_self () in
its constructor, further allocations during construction of base
class and derived classes might lead to mark_smob calls on the
object under construction.  When those call a virtual function like
derived_mark, the virtual function corresponding to the
incompletely initialized object is likely to be called.

This situation is acerbated in Guile 2.0 where the mark passes may occur
with only loose synchronization to the allocations.

The order of initialization of an object consists in calling the
constructors of virtual base classes, then of non-virtual base
classes, then initializing all data members.

As a result, the derived constructor comes too late for
initialization.  That's where the Preinit template class comes in.
Derive from it _before_ deriving from the smobifying base class
providing derived_mark, and it will call its Base class' pre_init
function (which must not rely on the instantiation being complete).

The pre_init function should then put the derived class into a state
_before_ its constructor or a constructor of its data members is being
called where it's safe to call its derived_mark function.  Note that in
particular that most STL data structures are in undefined state before
their constructor is being called, so the pre_init function has to
establish a state where derived_mark will not attempt to interpret data
members of types like std::vector which may not have been constructed
yet.





Use Preinit for Global_context, protect output definition


Use Preinit for font metrics


Use Preinit in Engraver_group


Use Preinit in Spanner


Use Preinit in Music


Use Preinit class in Scheme_engraver

This avoids calls of derived_mark on uninitialized data.  Fold
Scheme_engraver::init_from_scheme (SCM) into converting constructor
since it has become identical to it.

http://codereview.appspot.com/316890043


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options.  Or, if this is 
a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi___
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto