I'd like to get a set of categories for LSR snippets decided fairly
soon; we can't do much processing until we have this done.
Here's the definite list:
scheme-tricks
%% stuff like `adding the current date'. Short (one or two-line) scheme
code that can be copied and pasted easily into a score.
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival escreveu:
Han-Wen, should this be committed?
- Graham
I think I already did.
Argh, I was looking at the wrong set of braces. Yes, you already did it.
Sorry,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilyp
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
- The cut-&-pastable-section of the first example contains lots
of lines that are just confusing and should never be included
in a stand-alone .ly file. Maybe it's better to not use the fragment
option of lilypond-book and recommend the reader to only
cut the lines after
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
Categories or keywords? Will it be possible to use it offline?
Categories, as in directories. See
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/download/
(err, this is a bad example right now; I just asked Sebastino to
un-categorize everything so we could start from a clean slate. Check
th
It now works properly with the command:
git pull git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git/ web/master:web/master
Daniel Tonda C.
Karl Hammar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry. Now I actually checked: the url is
http://git.sv.gnu.org/r/lilypond.git
(Note that not only "http://"; is new, bu
Categories or keywords? Will it be possible to use it offline? E.g. in
LilyPondTool there is a full-text search, with weighted results. I
imagine writing "fermata last bar" and getting a snippet page (or more).
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
l
Graham Percival escreveu:
> As a security measure, I'd like to have a script that checks if a
> lilypond file contains any scheme. Is there any better way than
> searchign for "#(define" ?
The most effective method is to run it through lilypond --safe, I think.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PR
Maximilian Albert escreveu:
> On to my questions:
>
> 1) Is it correct that all I need to do in order to create a new glyph is
> to modify the metafont source file of the corresponding font? That is,
> are all the other files (*.otf, *.svg, etc.) created during the
> compilation process of lilypon
Graham Percival escreveu:
> As a security measure, I'd like to have a script that checks if a
> lilypond file contains any scheme. Is there any better way than
> searchign for "#(define" ?
>
> I'm not worried about a few false positives (if any non-scheme .ly file
> just happened to have "#(defin
Graham Percival escreveu:
> Han-Wen, should this be committed?
> - Graham
>
I think I already did.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
Thanks for all your ambituous documentation updates!
I've just looked at the first few pages, but have a couple of comments:
- The cut-&-pastable-section of the first example contains lots
of lines that are just confusing and should never be included
in a stand-alone .ly file. Maybe it's bette
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> it seems that
> the simple solution is to replace
> 2.
> by
> R2.
It works fine. Thanks a lot!
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
As a security measure, I'd like to have a script that checks if a
lilypond file contains any scheme. Is there any better way than
searchign for "#(define" ?
I'm not worried about a few false positives (if any non-scheme .ly file
just happened to have "#(define" in the text somewhere), but cou
Han-Wen, should this be committed?
- Graham
Vegard Nossum wrote:
PSS: It seems that the list moderator doesn't want me to post it myself, so I
try gmane again.
PS: It seems that the e-mail form over at
http://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel doesn't
work (I never got
Hi all,
You may have seen some emails about "LSR integration" without really
knowing what was going on. We finally have a working example! See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/input/lsr/advanced/collated-files.html
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/input/lsr/trick/collated-files.html
In the near fu
The rewritten tutorial is online,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Tutorial
Could a few people proofread it? In the near future the translation
teams will be working on it, so it would be good if we finalized node
names and caught any major mistakes.
Cheers,
- Graham
Bertalan Fodor escreveu:
> IMHO a Sibelius rendering would also be important, because as I know it
> more closely follows European engraving traditions, and it has already
> become another standard notation software.
I know. Sibelius' errors are fewer and less visible, though, so not as
effectiv
IMHO a Sibelius rendering would also be important, because as I know it
more closely follows European engraving traditions, and it has already
become another standard notation software.
Bert
Han-Wen Nienhuys írta:
Tõnis Kaumann escreveu:
A few remarks:
1) LilyPond site still refers to Fi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Sorry. Now I actually checked: the url is
>
> http://git.sv.gnu.org/r/lilypond.git
>
> (Note that not only "http://"; is new, but also "/r/").
Ok, so I update this file:
$ grep URL .git/remotes/origin
URL: http://git.sv.gnu.org/r/lilypond.git
$
in my local copy,
Tõnis Kaumann escreveu:
> A few remarks:
>
> 1) LilyPond site still refers to Finale 2003, which is already outdated. There
> have been Finale 2004, 2005, 2006 and the current version is 2007. So you
> might
> want to update your site and rewrite sections referring to "other" software.
I would w
make web fails (latest git) on input/bach-schenker.ly with a guile
error. I've attached the log file.
Processing `/home/joe/oldhome/joe/programming/reference-lilypond/input/bach-schenker.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
/home/joe/oldhome/joe/programming/reference-lilypond/input/bach-schenker.
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Jean-Charles wrote:
> Le 22.01.2007 12:15, Johannes Schindelin disait :
>
> >
> > http://git.sv.gnu.org/r/lilypond.git
> >
> > (Note that not only "http://"; is new, but also "/r/").
> >
>
> So, instead of th git protocol, one should go over http and DO NOT forge
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Tõnis Kaumann wrote:
> But keep in mind that in many (if not the most) cases the person
> entering the music is also a musician. Entering music in LiliPond is not
> difficult but it is everything but intuitive.
Your statement is not true for everybody. For example, if
A few remarks:
1) LilyPond site still refers to Finale 2003, which is already outdated. There
have been Finale 2004, 2005, 2006 and the current version is 2007. So you might
want to update your site and rewrite sections referring to "other" software.
2) The concept is very good! ...until one star
24 matches
Mail list logo
