Hi there,
Triggered by recent wikipedia messages, I had a peek at our
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilypond
page and found it still has the weird (long and not very
impressive) fire breathers example. Why the .ly at all,
better show impressive output and move .ly example
to a
Hi all,
I've been prompted by a reply from Mats on the -user list.
See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-02/msg00833.html
and follow-ups for the previous discussion on the topic. As far as I
can see, an implementation proposal is already available, just to commit.
I
2009/6/4 Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl:
Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 11:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco
Vila:
First thing we can do, given that the talk section is intended to
improve the article, is to write down these objections in it.
Well, that's what Han-Wen did in
If you're involved with LSR, check out the LSR update docs in the
CG on kainhofer in a day or so; please make corrections.
Could somebody process the files in input/new/revised/ ? And why
do we need this directory, anyway? Shouldn't those files just be
dumped into input/new/ ?
Cheers,
- Graham
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org.
I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too.
The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there
is no file
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
I don't know if there is any performance penalty, but it's probably
negligible. You could propose that these procedures be made public; I
am okay with it.
Then if no one has any reservations,
In message 200905312229.35014.reinh...@kainhofer.com, Reinhold
Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes
Am Sonntag, 31. Mai 2009 21:22:41 schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Op zaterdag 30-05-2009 om 22:46 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
Any more tips? I'd really like to get this
2009/6/4 Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl:
Hi there,
Triggered by recent wikipedia messages, I had a peek at our
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilypond
...
Possibly it's no wonder that wikipedia doesn't use lilypond,
considering that our article on wikipedia is so bad?
First
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:46:11PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2009
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org.
I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too.
The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there
is no file
Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 11:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco
Vila:
First thing we can do, given that the talk section is intended to
improve the article, is to write down these objections in it.
Well, that's what Han-Wen did in 2006. Nothing happened. I'd say:
be bold and fix it
Graham Percival wrote:
If you're involved with LSR, check out the LSR update docs in the
CG on kainhofer in a day or so; please make corrections.
Could somebody process the files in input/new/revised/ ? And why
do we need this directory, anyway? Shouldn't those files just be
dumped into
Hi there,
can someone fix this? This currently hangs the website update.
mkdir -p out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/
msgfmt --output=out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/newweb.mo po/de.po
po/de.po:166: end-of-line within string
po/de.po:167: end-of-line within string
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl -
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuyshanw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
can someone fix this? This currently hangs the website update.
mkdir -p out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/
msgfmt --output=out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/newweb.mo po/de.po
po/de.po:166: end-of-line within string
14 matches
Mail list logo
