Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 00:33 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen
Nienhuys:
Unfortunately, a lot of packages are not meant to be cross-compiled,
so a lot of things that GUB does are hackish. I'd not worry too much
about the messages; as long as things work, there are things much more
On 24 Jun 2009, at 23:13, Graham Percival wrote:
Carl is asking about the programming internals, not the end-user
input syntax.
Sure, but if the time signature is used as key, the worry is that the
user interface may already have been locked up.
Hans
Hey everyone,
Sorry if this is a sensitive topic... but
I figured we should probably remove Rune's
e-mail address from AUTHORS.texi.
Patch attached.
- Mark
0001-Remove-email-address.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing
Thanks, applied.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 02:52:55AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
Hey everyone,
Sorry if this is a sensitive topic... but
I figured we should probably remove Rune's
e-mail address from AUTHORS.texi.
Patch attached.
- Mark
On 6/24/09 8:49 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
One thing I don't understand: why do I need to use (load ...) to
retrieve functions that are defined with define-public in the same
directory?
The loading of the scm files is actually not taken care of by just being in
the
Mark,
I like this, because it makes the out-of-order stuff be only a programmer's
problem, and programmers can use searches to find the code they're looking
for.
A couple of other comments:
The name of the file is lily-sort.scm, but the comment in the header says
ly-sort.scm. I much prefer
Hello I'd like to contribute sending (I dont know where, sorry if this is not
the place) my espanol.ly, I have added:
* tcb, cb, cs, and tcs for tree-q-flat, q-flat, q-sharp and three-q-sharp.
* x also for double-sharp
The file:
%{
Common Spanish names for notes. b means flat (bemol), s
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I like this, because it makes the out-of-order stuff be only a
programmer's problem, and programmers can use searches to find
the code they're looking for.
To an extent, I would say. There's obvious value to well-organized
code. The more searches a programmer needs to
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I have not put a question mark on ci because ? is used in SICP
to indicate a predicate (i.e. a function returning a boolean)
rather than a boolean value directly.
I like it. Nice subtlety. Forgot to make that change in the
previous post (butI've noted it).
- Mark
On 6/25/09 1:23 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I like this, because it makes the out-of-order stuff be only a
programmer's problem, and programmers can use searches to find
the code they're looking for.
To an extent, I would say. There's
Oops, just discovered that (ly:char? #\ #\?) returns #t...
(tweaking some more)
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Here are 2 versions of the same procedure.
Is the second one *too* concise and cryptic?
- Mark
(define (ly:string-compare a b ci)
(let ((mismatch (first-diff-chars a b ci)))
(if mismatch
(if (car mismatch)
(if (cdr mismatch)
((if ci ly:char-ci? ly:char?)
Could you send a patch? Instructions are in the CG.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 05:22:24PM +, Maximiliano wrote:
Hello I'd like to contribute sending (I dont know where, sorry if this is not
the place) my espanol.ly, I have added:
With Carl's help, I've created a new file that contains procedures
for sorting lists and alists according to a specific algorithm
that generates more intuitively-ordered lists, which will make it
a lot easier to locate things in the docs, for example.
I've attached the file here, but I haven't
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 08:33:33AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 00:33 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen
Nienhuys:
Unfortunately, a lot of packages are not meant to be cross-compiled,
so a lot of things that GUB does are hackish. I'd not worry too much
On 6/25/09 4:51 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Here are 2 versions of the same procedure.
Is the second one *too* concise and cryptic?
- Mark
I actually like the general format of the second one better.
But I'd rewrite it a bit: It's a string-compare-? function, so
On 6/25/09 5:18 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
With Carl's help, I've created a new file that contains procedures
for sorting lists and alists according to a specific algorithm
that generates more intuitively-ordered lists, which will make it
a lot easier to locate things in
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
precisely where should I enter lily-sort.scm in the file
lily.scm?
IIUC, it can go anywhere in the list, as long as it's before any
files that need to use its functions when they are loaded.
Then I'll put it just before define-event-classes.scm, which is
the first
StreamEvent is listed in define-event-classes.scm, but the
capitalization of itself and its children makes it look more
like it belongs in define-event-classes.scm with the other
FooEvents...
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
lilypond-2.13.0-0.test-output.tar.bz2 lilypond-2.13.2-0.mingw.exe
lilypond-2.13.2-0.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2 lilypond-2.13.2-0.test-output.tar.bz2
lilypond-2.13.2-0.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:53:47PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
lilypond-2.13.0-0.test-output.tar.bz2 lilypond-2.13.2-0.mingw.exe
lilypond-2.13.2-0.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
21 matches
Mail list logo
