On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 07:42:01AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
IMHO, this kind of bugs which are quite serious IMHO should
get a special tag in the bug tracker, perhaps something like
`priority'.
I don't know if they're as visible as #612, but I find #379 and
#427 personally
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 10:31:46AM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
server could adjust the MIME type of png images so the browser offers
to open it directly
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
server could adjust the MIME type of png images so the browser offers
to open it directly with a suitable
2009/7/5 Cameron Horsburgh cammobla...@gmail.com:
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
server could adjust the MIME type of png images so the
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
2009/7/5 Cameron Horsburgh cammobla...@gmail.com:
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
server could
At 10:31 on 05 Jul 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
server could adjust the MIME type of png images so the browser offers
to open it directly with a suitable
2009/7/5 Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net:
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1163
Mark Knoop
Thank you, here is comprehensively explained. Are you horndude77?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
___
lilypond-devel mailing
At 13:32 on 05 Jul 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/7/5 Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net:
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1163
Mark Knoop
Thank you, here is comprehensively explained. Are you horndude77?
No. But I do wish they would fix this...
--
Mark Knoop
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Mark Knoopm...@opus11.net wrote:
At 13:32 on 05 Jul 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/7/5 Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net:
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1163
Mark Knoop
Thank you, here is comprehensively explained. Are you horndude77?
No.
2009/7/5 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
The current policy is that only crashes and regressions get higher
priority; everything else is medium, low, or postponed. If we
listed those bugs as higher priority, would it change anything?
Would Chris work on it before Aug? Would
Hello,
I have updated my patchset on Rietveld:
http://codereview.appspot.com/83046/show
Thank you all for your reviews. I have a few questions/concerns:
1.) I used Jan's suggestion for -d option name, but I'm not sure this
is the best name. What should the option be called?
2.) Is
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:29:44PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
1.) I used Jan's suggestion for -d option name, but I'm not sure this
is the best name. What should the option be called?
-dwarning-as-error
looks fine to me.
3.) I don't know how to enable the -d option by default for
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 05:39:45PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:29:44PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
1.) I used Jan's suggestion for -d option name, but I'm not sure this
is the best name. What should the option be called?
-dwarning-as-error
looks fine to me.
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:01:21PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 05:39:45PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:29:44PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
1.) I used Jan's suggestion for -d option name, but I'm not sure this
is the best name. What
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:22:02PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:01:21PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 05:39:45PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
-dwarning-as-error
looks fine to me.
Okay. On second thought, it looks decent to me
In other words, some makefile hacking is needed, which I would
probably need to delegate.
I agree.
I doubt that the regtests compile without warnings,
Correct. Some of them are even expected to emit warning or error messages.
and I'm not certain that we have enough Frogs to eat all the
16 matches
Mail list logo
