On 5/14/10 8:18 AM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen:
>> On 5/14/10 7:01 AM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
>>> Carl Sorensen:
> ...
>> You also need to redefine the 'stencil for laissez-vibrez tie in
>> scm/define-grobs.scm.
> ...
>
> I can help with doning the regression test. Second-guessing wh
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Welcome to the club... I ran into that problem two years ago, and I haven't
> yet found a solution:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-03/msg00232.html
re my last email about temporary bug squad members from 30 se
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> I would have been willing to do this if no one else had
>> stepped forward, but Patrick has - thanks Patrick. If you
>> lose interest after a while let me know and I'll continu
Carl Sorensen:
> On 5/14/10 7:01 AM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
> > Carl Sorensen:
...
> You also need to redefine the 'stencil for laissez-vibrez tie in
> scm/define-grobs.scm.
...
I can help with doning the regression test. Second-guessing what
Niels patch was about was not included in that offer.
On 5/14/10 7:01 AM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen:
>> On 5/13/10 1:11 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
> ...
>> make test-baseline
> ...
>> make check
> ...
>
> Ok, done that.
>
> With the guidance from http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=881:
>
> I can't explain why, but m
Carl Sorensen:
> On 5/13/10 1:11 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
...
> make test-baseline
...
> make check
...
Ok, done that.
With the guidance from http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=881:
I can't explain why, but making the print function pure by redefining
ly:tie::print
just for
