Dear documentation editors,
In the existing @knownissues for cadenzaOn, I suggest adding one sentence (in
context below) encouraging manual beams. Users might *think* autobeaming works
through cadenzas, and it does for a while, but it will not through longer
cadenzas.
There is a related
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Does this patch look ok?
Were I daring enough, I'd say LGTM :-)
(But you do want other people to comment on that.)
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
Keith E OHara wrote Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:18 AM
In the existing @knownissues for cadenzaOn, I suggest adding one
sentence (in context below) encouraging manual beams. Users might
*think* autobeaming works through cadenzas, and it does for a
while, but it will not through longer
WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
item. For systems this is the middle line of the nearest
staff, and for markups this is the highest point of the
On 10/5/10 12:09 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
item. For systems this is the middle line of the
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
item. For systems this is the middle
On 2010-10-05 21:53, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 10/5/10 12:09 PM, Mark Poleskymarkpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Of the three, bottom-system-spacing is slightly more
complicated, since it currently controls the spacing below
systems *and* markups, when either is the last on a page.
So the natural
