Am 02.11.2010 04:04, schrieb carl.d.soren...@gmail.com:
Updated to only acknowledge tab-note-head, not note-head.
Makes perfect sense to me.
Thanks for your work!
Marc
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/2723043/
___
lilypond-devel
Hello list, hello Valentin (I think you are the master of the tracker),
Federico Bruni raised this issue long ago, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-05/msg00355.html
I made some attempts to get this done, but the almost solution I
reached didn't satisfy me completely (it
On 11/3/10 6:50 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 04:04, schrieb carl.d.soren...@gmail.com:
Updated to only acknowledge tab-note-head, not note-head.
Makes perfect sense to me.
Thanks for your work!
You're welcome.
Pushed to git.
Thanks,
Carl
Am 03.11.2010 15:11, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/3/10 7:03 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Hello list, hello Valentin (I think you are the master of the tracker),
Federico Bruni raised this issue long ago, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-05/msg00355.html
Am 03.11.2010 15:10, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/3/10 6:50 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 04:04, schrieb carl.d.soren...@gmail.com:
Updated to only acknowledge tab-note-head, not note-head.
Makes perfect sense to me.
Thanks for your work!
Good afternoon, my name is Martin Guzman. I am a student of Computer Science at
the Del Valle University of Guatemala. I am currently taking the course of
construction of compilers, so I've been doing research on conventional and non
conventional compilers. As part of my research I found LilyPond,
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:49:17PM +, MartínGuzmán wrote:
Good afternoon, my name is Martin Guzman. I am a student of Computer Science
at
the Del Valle University of Guatemala. I am currently taking the course of
construction of compilers, so I've been doing research on conventional and
Hello,
On 03/11/2010 16:49, MartínGuzmán wrote:
Good afternoon, my name is Martin Guzman. I am a student of Computer Science at
the Del Valle University of Guatemala. I am currently taking the course of
construction of compilers, so I've been doing research on conventional and non
conventional
On 3 November 2010 16:15, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 15:10, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/3/10 6:50 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 04:04, schrieb carl.d.soren...@gmail.com:
Updated to only acknowledge tab-note-head, not note-head.
Makes perfect
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:26 PM, James james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
This document explains how to execute the programs distributed with LilyPond
version 2.13.38.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/usage/index.html
This is the Internals Reference (IR) for version 2.13.38 of LilyPond,
On 3 November 2010 18:27, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
I would expect a student of computer science to be able to find
the answer to this question. I will not do your homework for you.
Is it really the same person that grumble about the lack of developers
and that slam the door
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a shame Carl's already pushed the patch; I don't think it's ready yet.
Nah, I think Carl pushed his patch too early just so I don't feel
alone anymore :)
Valentin.
___
James wrote:
Unless we really explain this properly in the docs what
this term actually means, it really does put a lot of
people off (i.e. me).
There are two rather large doc patches already under
construction (and being discussed) to address this:
http://codereview.appspot.com/2758042/
On 11/3/10 12:43 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 November 2010 16:15, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 15:10, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/3/10 6:50 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 04:04, schrieb carl.d.soren...@gmail.com:
On 11/3/10 10:15 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 15:10, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/3/10 6:50 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 02.11.2010 04:04, schrieb carl.d.soren...@gmail.com:
Updated to only acknowledge tab-note-head, not note-head.
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:11:18PM +0100, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
Is it really the same person that grumble about the lack of developers
and that slam the door in the face of a student of computer science
_interested in LilyPond_?
He wasn't asking about writing code. He wanted information of
On 3 November 2010 19:33, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
But the tie callback *should* make the notehead transparent if there's no
slur or gliss (or bend, in the future). In the absence of slur, gliss, or
split tie the notehead is transparent. In the presence of one of these,
it's
Hi Carl,
What do you think about folding this code into the
Tab_note_heads_engraver? We could store the created TabNoteHead grobs
and add an acknowledger for Tie, then set 'tie-follow in
stop_translation_timestep ().
Cheers,
Neil
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 06:35:55PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
If somebody makes an honest effort, I'm willing to help them with
coursework. But I saw no evidence that he had put any effort into
his
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 06:35:55PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
If somebody makes an honest effort, I'm willing to help them with
2010/11/3 Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com
Actually, now I really like refstaff/oppstaff:
nonstaff-refstaff-spacing
nonstaff-nonstaff-spacing
nonstaff-oppstaff-spacing
Somehow I don't like it. It feels not descriptive enough imo, at least for
non-native english speakers: users would
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
Renaming proposals, round 3:
CURRENT NAME PROPOSED NAME TD's PREFERENCE
- ---
next-staff staff-staff
default-next-staff
Carl Sorensen wrote Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:00 PM
On 11/3/10 2:49 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Trevor wrote:
I wonder if affinity/nonaffinity are optimal. Are they
better than relatedstaff/unrelatedstaff?
Or target/opposite, reference/opposite,
On 2010/11/03 23:14:47, Carl wrote:
I think I'd probably go a bit farther.
What if we acknowledged ties, slurs, and glissandos (glissandi?) in
the
Tab_note_head_engraver and set the desired properties there.
Which properties?
If it involves multiple nested loops (like the original
On 2 November 2010 07:41, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Have you meanwhile found some time to ponder? I'm quite curious...
Yes. :)
Here's the short answer:
chain_callback () returns SCM_UNDEFINED if the property data being
chained isn't a procedure or closure.
(grob-closure.cc)
78
On 2010/11/03 20:46:27, Neil Puttock wrote:
Hi Carl,
What do you think about folding this code into the
Tab_note_heads_engraver? We
could store the created TabNoteHead grobs and add an acknowledger for
Tie, then
set 'tie-follow in stop_translation_timestep ().
I think I'd probably go
On 11/3/10 9:34 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 15:11, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/3/10 7:03 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote:
Hello list, hello Valentin (I think you are the master of the tracker),
Federico Bruni raised this issue long ago, see
On 11/3/10 2:49 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Note that item2 is not necessarily below item1; for
example, 'loose-staff-spacing will measure upwards from
the loose line if 'staff-affinity = #UP.
Trevor wrote:
I wonder if affinity/nonaffinity are optimal. Are they
better
On 11/3/10 5:52 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010/11/03 23:14:47, Carl wrote:
I think I'd probably go a bit farther.
What if we acknowledged ties, slurs, and glissandos (glissandi?) in
the
Tab_note_head_engraver and set the desired properties there.
Which
Here's the short answer:
Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation!
chain_callback () returns SCM_UNDEFINED if the property data being
chained isn't a procedure or closure. [...]
For me, this seems to be the right action.
For TupletNumber, [...] since its positioning relies on the
30 matches
Mail list logo
