Re: Tied harmonics in tablature - tracker issue

2010-11-08 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 07.11.2010 23:51, schrieb Valentin Villenave: On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote: I came up with the idea to parenthesize the Harmonic brackets instead of the TabNoteHead and thus provide the possibility to left-parenthesize or right-parenthesize an item, but

Re: renaming vertical spacing inside systems props

2010-11-08 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mark Polesky wrote Monday, November 08, 2010 1:24 AM Instead of these two: withingroup-staff-staff-spacing staffgroup-staff-spacing Let's stay with these. Trevor ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: renaming vertical spacing inside systems props

2010-11-08 Thread Jan Warchoł
2010/11/8 Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com: Instead of these two:  withingroup-staff-staff-spacing  staffgroup-staff-spacing While these aren't perfect, i'd say that  within-group-staff-staff-spacing  below-group-staff-staff-spacing  inside-group-staff-staff-spacing  

Re: [Patch] Fix #1365: convert-ly shouldn't remove Dynamicsperformergroup

2010-11-08 Thread Trevor Daniels
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Monday, November 08, 2010 12:09 AM Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, um 20:46:54 schrieb Trevor Daniels: I think this would be an improvement, but I don't think it's essential. The file will be left in an erroneous state so the user will be forced into further

Re: Tied harmonics in tablature - tracker issue

2010-11-08 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote: Carl has some good ideas about this issue, but meanwhile, I think we (you :-) should put it on the tracker, so it doesn't get lost. There you go! http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1386 Cheers, Valentin.

Re: Renaming the 'space alist-key

2010-11-08 Thread Alexander Kobel
On 2010-11-07 16:30, Mark Polesky wrote: [...] SPACE MINIMUM-DISTANCE -- -- 1) basic-distanceminimum-distance 2) initial-distanceminimum-distance 3) basic-separation minimum-separation 4) initial-separation minimum-separation

Re: [Patch] Fix #1365: convert-ly shouldn't remove Dynamicsperformergroup

2010-11-08 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: There might even be an argument for adding something which made compilation fail - in a way that clearly indicated the problem, of course. Bold idea... or insane, I can't decide which one it is. :-) Anyway, this

Re: [Patch] Fix #1365: convert-ly shouldn't remove Dynamicsperformergroup

2010-11-08 Thread Trevor Daniels
Valentin Villenave wrote Monday, November 08, 2010 11:16 AM On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: There might even be an argument for adding something which made compilation fail - in a way that clearly indicated the problem, of course. Bold idea...

Re: \layout vs. \paper

2010-11-08 Thread Francisco Vila
I am top-posting. James: did you maybe have an answer to this question on another thread? I am also interested. Docs say something but they could be possibly clearer on this subject. I'd like to improve this situation. 2010/10/30 James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com: -Original Message-

Please rewrite { ... } \\ { ... } construct

2010-11-08 Thread Xavier Scheuer
Dear LilyPond developers, Kieren, We have had a discussion one year ago about a project to rewrite the { ... } \\ { ... } so it behaves exactly like { % continuation of the main Voice from outside the polyphony \voiceOne ... } \context Voice = 2 {

Re: \layout vs. \paper

2010-11-08 Thread James
Francisco, On 08/11/2010 11:38, Francisco Vila wrote: James: did you maybe have an answer to this question on another thread? I am also interested. Docs say something but they could be possibly clearer on this subject. I'd like to improve this situation. I had no specific answer. As my last

Re: \layout vs. \paper

2010-11-08 Thread James
Hello, On 08/11/2010 12:00, James wrote: I am not a developer so do not know the internal workings of the code, however the above tracker is a doc bug.. Sorry that was probably badly worded, it is an 'open issue'. ;) James ___ lilypond-devel

Re: Please rewrite { ... } \\ { ... } construct

2010-11-08 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote: We have had a discussion one year ago about a project to rewrite the   { ... } \\ { ... } Hi Xavier, isn't that the discussion I tried to sum up on http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1316 ? Please repost

Re: Please rewrite { ... } \\ { ... } construct

2010-11-08 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 8 November 2010 13:05, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote: Hi Xavier, isn't that the discussion I tried to sum up on http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1316 ? Yes, it is exactly that! I looked into the tracker but did not find this issue. Typing \\ into the

Re: Web: Announcement update for the new LilyPond Report

2010-11-08 Thread Francisco Vila
Hello Valentin, I think that $ git diff Documentation/web/news-front.itexi @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ today is LilyPond’s co-founder and core developper read on to find out what for! Come -...@uref{http://news.lilynet.net/The-LilyPond-Report-21, read

Re: Web: Announcement update for the new LilyPond Report

2010-11-08 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote: Hello Valentin, I think that -...@uref{http://news.lilynet.net/The-LilyPond-Report-21, read Yes indeed, this commit was littered with clumsiness. Hopefully everything is fixed now; sorry for the git-history noise but I

Re: Please rewrite { ... } \\ { ... } construct

2010-11-08 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:51 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Slurs, ties etc from outside to the second voice would still be forbidden.  The problem really is that Lilypond's notion of continuity (we have that also in repeat alternatives, codas and similar) is too naive. About this

vertical spacing: Rename properties. (issue2968042)

2010-11-08 Thread markpolesky
Reviewers: , Message: Here's a patch set for this big syntax change. I went with withingroup since it got more votes. Okay to push? - Mark Description: vertical spacing: Rename properties. Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/2968042/ Affected files: M

Re: renaming vertical spacing inside systems props

2010-11-08 Thread Mark Polesky
Keith E OHara wrote: We will use this in context that makes that first qualifier almost redundant : \override Context.StaffGrouper #'withingroup-staff-staff-spacing This is an excellent point, and in response I'd like to propose one more option -- just remove the withingroup prefix altogether:

Re: Tied harmonics in tablature - tracker issue

2010-11-08 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 08.11.2010 11:59, schrieb Valentin Villenave: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de wrote: Carl has some good ideas about this issue, but meanwhile, I think we (you :-) should put it on the tracker, so it doesn't get lost. There you go!

Re: Please rewrite { ... } \\ { ... } construct

2010-11-08 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 8 November 2010 13:05, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote: Please repost your mail as a comment there, I think it will be more appropriate, useful and (possibly) efficient :-) Done. David Slurs, ties etc from outside to the second voice would still be forbidden. The

Re: renaming vertical spacing inside systems props

2010-11-08 Thread David Kastrup
Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com writes: % space between consecutive staves in a system \override VerticalAxisGroup #'staff-staff-spacing % space between consecutive staves in a staff-group \override StaffGrouper #'staff-staff-spacing The property descriptions could have a brief

coloratio, black mensural notation

2010-11-08 Thread Benkő Pál
hi list, the attached patch adds noteheads needed for black mensural notation (BMN) and coloratio in white mensural notation (WMN). note that it's just the noteheads: in both BMN and coloratio sections in WMN a fourth note looks like a flagged half note. I could reach this look by the following

Re: renaming vertical spacing inside systems props

2010-11-08 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 11/8/10 1:14 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: Keith E OHara wrote: We will use this in context that makes that first qualifier almost redundant : \override Context.StaffGrouper #'withingroup-staff-staff-spacing This is an excellent point, and in response I'd like to

Re: renaming vertical spacing inside systems props

2010-11-08 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mark Polesky wrote Monday, November 08, 2010 7:14 PM Keith E OHara wrote: We will use this in context that makes that first qualifier almost redundant : \override Context.StaffGrouper #'withingroup-staff-staff-spacing This is an excellent point, and in response I'd like to propose one more

Re: renaming vertical spacing inside systems props

2010-11-08 Thread Keith E OHara
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:14:11 -0800, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: Similarly, I think the two 'staff-staff-spacing properties would be intuitive and easy enough to keep separate, mentally: % space between consecutive staves in a system \override VerticalAxisGroup

Re: renaming vertical spacing inside systems props

2010-11-08 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 11/8/10 9:34 PM, Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:14:11 -0800, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: Similarly, I think the two 'staff-staff-spacing properties would be intuitive and easy enough to keep separate, mentally: % space between

Re: renaming vertical spacing inside systems props

2010-11-08 Thread Werner LEMBERG
\override StaffGrouper #'staff-staff-spacing \override StaffGrouper #'staffgroup-staff-spacing LGTM (As I've said before, I admire your persistence :) If David's comment isn't a valid concern, this is fine with me too. Werner ___

Re: (font-related) \caps \fontCaps and \smallCaps

2010-11-08 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Before having access to OpenType features, I consider any change in the font interface premature. OK, but I have other font-related issues I wanted to report. Maybe I could report them anyway, so people know developers are aware of these issues (and in the same time devs could think at