Hi Carl.
- Original Message -
From: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: Issues to verify
On 12/14/10 10:26 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
There are
Doc build is failing since yesterday evening for me. It built in w/o
errors in the morning. I've committed new code locally to the CG but I
don't think that's the problem. Here's the part of the log that has
errors near the end:
Converting to PNG...[././62/lily-b9a00701.eps]
GPL Ghostscript 8.71
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
since most will use it in a VM. Now I'm running make all and make doc
to test it before sharing. Incidentally I'd hate to have to build the
Hi,
I've read Issue classification and i think it would be good to add one
more guideline concerning priority: i believe that the priority should
depend on how widespread the issue is. Even minor problems concernning
some basic elements (that will probably happen many times in even a
single
On Wed 15 Dec 2010, 12:53 Janek Warchoł wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
I've read Issue classification and i think it would be good to add one
more guideline concerning priority: i believe that the priority should
depend on how widespread the issue is. Even minor problems concernning
some basic elements
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 11:53 AM
Subject: issue classification: priority guidelines
Hi,
I've read Issue classification and i think it would be good to add
Jonathan,
On 15/12/2010 10:35, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Doc build is failing since yesterday evening for me. It built in w/o
errors in the morning.
I've built my doc with no issues, but it depends on what you call
'yesterday evening'.
What is the last commit you have in your source (apart from
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:40 AM, James james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Doc build is failing since yesterday evening for me. It built in w/o
errors in the morning.
I've built my doc with no issues, but it depends on what you call 'yesterday
evening'.
What is the last commit you have in your
On 12/15/10 12:28 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 15.12.2010 00:18, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 12/14/10 4:15 PM, Graham Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I only just realized that I should have done
git add input/regression/*.ly
after apply Neil's patches with patch
Jonathan
On 15/12/2010 13:19, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Jamesjames.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Doc build is failing since yesterday evening for me. It built in w/o
errors in the morning.
I've built my doc with no issues, but it depends on what you call 'yesterday
On 12/15/10 6:42 AM, James james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Jonathan
On 15/12/2010 13:19, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Jamesjames.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Doc build is failing since yesterday evening for me. It built in w/o
errors in the morning.
I've built my
Hi Jan-Peter,
2010/12/13 Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de
Hello list,
I wrote a script to align dynamics centered on the corresponding note:
--snip--
\version 2.12.3
% calculate x-alignment based on attribute text + dynamic text
#(define-markup-command (center-dyn layout props atr-text
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
The new .iso file is ready. You can brows for it at this address:
http://files.lilynet.net/
or download directly using this one:
http://files.lilynet.net/lilybuntu2.iso
http://files.lilynet.net/lilybuntu2.iso.md5
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:31:02PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł
I've read Issue classification and i think it would be good to add one
more guideline concerning priority: i believe that the priority should
depend on how widespread the issue is.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 05:11:46AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
The new .iso file is ready. You can brows for it at this address:
Great!
If you want to test it, please feel free. Note that the lily-git.tcl
script is already in the user's home directory, ready to grab the
source code.
2010/12/15 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
In the mean time, go ahead and twiddle the definitions of
priorities (as long as you leave Critical alone). But be aware
that you're rearranging deck chairs on the titanic.
ROTFL -- my point exactly :-)
Cheers,
V.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Valentin Villenave
valen...@villenave.net wrote:
I've added a bitTorrent tracker and server as well:
http://torrents.lilynet.net
Cheers,
Valentin.
Excellent! Thanks Valentin. I'm set up to be a seeder.
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
* Priority-High: An issue which produces output which does not accurately
reflect the input (e.g where the user would expect an accidental, but none
is shown) or which produces aesthetically poor output in a situation which
What I'm trying to do is document a categorisation that makes the job of the
bug squad easier. Unless anyone says no, I'll ask for the changes proposed
to be made.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net
To: Graham Percival
No significant changes that I can see, except the missing initial bar in the
skipTypesetting tests, which is expected new behaviour. I'll run my checker
when I'm not otherwise using the PC.
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
___
lilypond-devel mailing
2010/12/15 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Look, the ugly truth is that the priority field -- other than
critical -- has no effect on lilypond development. I've been
heavily involved since 2003 (before this issue tracker in 2006),
and that's my observation. It has no statistically
hello,
On 15/12/2010 14:58, Graham Percival wrote:
With that in mind, could James (continue) to test it, making sure
that he looks at the docs in current git rather than relying on
his own knowledge?
The iso is now downloaded.
I'll look at the CG in Git (once I can compile the docs again :)
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:48 PM, James james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Or I can use the CG on the website which seems to be
Development for LilyPond 2.13.43
Actually, that's fine for you. Nothing has changed since .43 yet.
I'm halfway done downloading it, and I'll make small tweaks as I go
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote in message
news:iealqb$3k...@dough.gmane.org...
No significant changes that I can see, except the missing initial bar in
the skipTypesetting tests, which is expected new behaviour. I'll run my
checker when I'm not otherwise using the PC.
--
Phil Holmes
2010/12/15 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
Ok, this means i have to fix some (lots of?) stuff myself (you got me
hooked perhaps, however i don't know how all this will turn out)...
Yes.
The following is for anyone interested in helping me in this task.
I have some basic
Janek
On 15/12/2010 15:32, Janek Warchoł wrote:
but i struggle with unbelieveably low VirtualBox
resolution - 800x600, it annoys me extremely on my big monitor. Maybe
i'll find an answer on the web
Look in the help.
9.6. Advanced display configuration
James
On 12/15/10 8:32 AM, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/12/15 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Fighting about whether a bug should be high vs. low does NOTHING
to get it fixed sooner or later. This is a volunteer project, and
lilypond developers do not appear
We have a lot of newbie contributors now. That's great! However,
newbie contributors aren't confident, and aren't able to figure
out why the build is failing. Especially when they're trying to
build lilypond for the first time, and automatically assume that
if git master can't build it's their
We have one Critical issue remanining:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1290
I'm estimating a 4-line patch to one file.
Once such a patch has been pushed, I'm branching off stable/2.14,
releasing the first release candidate, and starting the two-week
timer. During that period,
hello,
On 14/12/2010 03:14, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I made a new .iso with fontforge 20100501 built from source, as well
as dblatex. ./autogen.sh now runs with no warnings or errors.
Yes I can confirm this too.
Am starting a make ; make doc now.
Now if we could configure LilyGit.tcl to have
On 12/15/10 10:19 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
We have a lot of newbie contributors now. That's great! However,
newbie contributors aren't confident, and aren't able to figure
out why the build is failing. Especially when they're trying to
build lilypond for the
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Only significant changes shown with my comparator are the skipTypesetting
tests. Not only have we lost the bat mark, but the tests are somewhat
further left and lower. See attached image as an example.
Nooo! I can't
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:34:59AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
We've got to have some better process to handle this.
Agreed.
I don't know what it is.
For a symptomatic treatment, this particular case could be checked
with
make test
instead of make doc. That'd be 5-10 minutes instead of an
delurking for a moment ...
* Carl Sorensen wrote on Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:34:59PM CET:
In order to be sure a one-line patch doesn't break the build, we need to to
make doc-clean make doc,
That simply means that there is a bug in the build system, in that it
doesn't track all dependencies.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
We've got to have some better process to handle this. I don't know what it
is. Maybe a correct build system, so we don't need to do make doc-clean to
ensure things aren't broken. Maybe an english-only make doc, so we
* Graham Percival wrote on Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:14:37PM CET:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Carl Sorensen wrote on Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:34:59PM CET:
In order to be sure a one-line patch doesn't break the build, we need to to
make doc-clean make doc,
On 12/15/10 10:34 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 12/15/10 10:19 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Carl: I killed your 713aeac92c2bd06a9ae0ed38d13f4b20fba3f9a8 which
was the regtest for 1440. Dunno why it was failing; building it
from the command-line
On 12/15/10 10:57 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:34:59AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
We've got to have some better process to handle this.
Agreed.
I don't know what it is.
For a symptomatic treatment, this particular case could be checked
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Despite the excitement about 2.14, I'm going to be working on
lilybuntu and the early CG chapters since we've had a surge of new
contributors. I won't be working on a patch for 1290, but rest
Just a reminder
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:50 AM, James james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Now if we could configure LilyGit.tcl to have another button to 'compile
(doc) for the first time'
It could run ./autogen.sh and then make ; make doc.
I rarely make install personally.
But thanks again Jonathan!
No
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on a slight improvement right now. I've made a desktop
launcher for lily-git.tcl and I want to see if I can make it appear on
the user's desktop by default instead of in the home directory. Trying
to make
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
You might feel an urge to rush to push stuff onto master right now
to get it in before 2.14.0. Don't. There will be plenty of
other releases. We have way too much new stuff in 2.14.0 as it
is. The world will
On 12/15/10 12:15 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Despite the excitement about 2.14, I'm going to be working on
lilybuntu and the early CG chapters since we've had a surge of new
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on a slight improvement right now. I've made a desktop
launcher for lily-git.tcl and I want to see if I can make it appear on
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Just a reminder that I've prepared an addition to CG with steps to
creation of lilybuntu and am only waiting to test doc-build after
Carl's regtest is sorted.
Graham's reversion solved the doc-build problem.
I'm
On 12/15/10 1:24 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Just a reminder that I've prepared an addition to CG with steps to
creation of lilybuntu and am only waiting to test doc-build after
Carl's regtest is
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:56:15PM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
However there's a bunch of patches that have been sitting there for a
while: off the top of my head,
I really hope you just did a
label:patch
search in the issue tracker to find that liast.
Do we really want to ship a new
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:24:15PM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Thanks Carl, I'm in the middle of a make-doc after doing exactly as
you said. Assuming it compiles without errors, do I do:
you read the lily-git.tcl section in the CG.
git push origin
or is it something else?
... if you
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
... if you have git push access (which I think you do), and if you
haven't changed anything since last year, then yes.
Got it. Pushed. Thanks guys,
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I really hope you just did a
label:patch
search in the issue tracker to find that liast.
Nope. Some of these are untracked.
Yes. Because the VERY FIRST gop policy debate is about how we
deal with patches.
Do
On 12/15/10 12:56 PM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote:
... and that's but what I could come up with with a quick search on
Rietveld.
How did you do your search on Rietveld? I've never been able to find a
decent method to search Rietveld.
Thanks,
Carl
On 14 December 2010 23:18, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 12/14/10 4:15 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I only just realized that I should have done
git add input/regression/*.ly
after apply Neil's patches with patch -p1 foo.diff
Sorry about that.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
How did you do your search on Rietveld? I've never been able to find a
decent method to search Rietveld.
There isn't. All I could do was to browse the user's pages for a few
known associates of the LilyPond project: e.g.
53 matches
Mail list logo
