add \displayLilyMusic to snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=507

2011-02-15 Thread -Eluze
now and then i use this little snippet ( http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=507 http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=507 ), but each time i have to figure out newly how it works… i suggest to add something like: … with '\displayLilyMusic \ghostMusic \notes' the ghost voice is written to the

Re: add \displayLilyMusic to snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=507

2011-02-15 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: -Eluze elu...@gmail.com To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 8:20 AM Subject: add \displayLilyMusic to snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=507 now and then i use this little snippet ( http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=507

More on 1504

2011-02-15 Thread Mike Solomon
This snippet of code: \paper { ragged-right = ##t } \new Staff { \relative c' { \cadenzaOn \override Beam #'breakable = ##t \override Beam #'grow-direction = #RIGHT a32 [ b c d e f \bar \break g ] } } \new Staff { \relative c' { \cadenzaOn \override Beam #'breakable = ##t \override Beam

Documentation request

2011-02-15 Thread Phil Holmes
The NR, 1.2.6 Special rhythmic concerns, Grace notes, says: A \grace music expression will introduce special typesetting settings, for example, to produce smaller type, and set directions. Hence, when introducing layout tweaks to override the special settings, they should be placed inside the

RE: Documentation request

2011-02-15 Thread James Lowe
Phil )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of Phil Holmes )Sent: 15 February 2011 12:47 )To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: Documentation request ) )The NR, 1.2.6

Re: Add dots to tocItemMarkup (issue4172047)

2011-02-15 Thread bordage . bertrand
Update on http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1517 http://codereview.appspot.com/4172047/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Documentation request

2011-02-15 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com To: 'Phil Holmes' m...@philholmes.net; lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 1:00 PM Subject: RE: Documentation request Phil )-Original Message- )From:

Re: Doc -- Clarify instructions on autobeam settings (issue4160048)

2011-02-15 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
On 2011/02/15 07:15:48, Trevor Daniels wrote: http://codereview.appspot.com/4160048/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode2211 Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:2211: To avoid this problem, the time signature can be set in only one I still prefer should I don't want to

Re: Add dots to tocItemMarkup (issue4172047)

2011-02-15 Thread percival . music . ca
On 2011/02/15 13:17:01, Bertrand Bordage wrote: Update on http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1517 I've added this to codereview. Bertrand, could you upload it to codereview yourself, with a new codereview issue number? I think the instructions in the Contributor's Guide are

Re: Add documentation for -dinclude-settings cmd line option (issue4129053)

2011-02-15 Thread percival . music . ca
I do not believe that this is the latest version; could we close this issue, and put a link to the real version on the google tracker issue 1510 ? http://codereview.appspot.com/4129053/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: Doc -- Clarify instructions on autobeam settings (issue4160048)

2011-02-15 Thread percival . music . ca
LGTM. I prefer not to fuss about @knownissues, so just push it when(ever) you think it's good enough. http://codereview.appspot.com/4160048/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):

Re: collision between beams and grace notes

2011-02-15 Thread Keith OHara
mike at apollinemike.com mike at apollinemike.com writes: On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:20 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: On Mon 07 Feb 2011, 21:17 Werner LEMBERG wrote: \header { texidoc = The beaming algorithm should handle collisions between beams and grace notes too. Here is a

Re: Fix 1229 Ensure space around prefatory matter (issue4187043)

2011-02-15 Thread k-ohara5a5a
On 2011/02/14 23:25:21, Keith wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:43:37 -0800, mailto:n.putt...@gmail.com wrote: My only concern with these changes is the barline avoidance (which you mention in the tracker as possibly a good thing). There's one regtest which shows the problem: in

Re: Add dots to tocItemMarkup (issue4172047)

2011-02-15 Thread bordage . bertrand
Yes, sorry... I made a new codereview issue : http://codereview.appspot.com/4182056/ ...(currently reading the Contributor's Guide again)... http://codereview.appspot.com/4172047/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: Add modal transformations provided by Mike Ellis (issue4079064)

2011-02-15 Thread Trevor Daniels
percival.music...@gmail.com wrote Saturday, February 05, 2011 6:20 PM http://codereview.appspot.com/4079064/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode827 Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:827: it may be converted to its @notation{retrograde} (written backwards). I'm not certain

Re: accidentaled notes too far from the barline

2011-02-15 Thread Janek Warchoł
2011/2/14 Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net:  The override below makes the spring stiff enough to avoid this extra check, so the spring near the accidental is not lenghened. (The override will not work well in tight layouts.) Does this produce closer to what the good engravers do? -Keith

DOC: NR 1.5.2 Multiple voices - part combining (issue4188056)

2011-02-15 Thread ColinPKCampbell
Reviewers: , Message: Add documentation of partcombine functions. See issue 1518 on the bug tracker. Description: DOC: NR 1.5.2 Multiple voices - part combining Adds explanations and examples of part combine functions to NR 1.5.2 Multiple voices - Automatic part combining Patch based on issue

Re: DOC: NR 1.5.2 Multiple voices - part combining (issue4188056)

2011-02-15 Thread percival . music . ca
LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode846 Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely:846:

Re: DOC: NR 1.5.2 Multiple voices - part combining (issue4188056)

2011-02-15 Thread k-ohara5a5a
Looks good as it is, better if you can add one markup that Reinhold missed in the example. http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):