2011/2/18 Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is a somewhat old request. Are there any known issues with adding
the Tweak_engraver to the Dynamics context? Thanks.
I have added tracker issue for this:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:00:17PM +0100, Benkő Pál wrote:
as a start I'd take Graham Breed's microtonal thingy:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-02/msg00567.html
I don't recommend that; Felipe has been working on microtonal
notation support. See:
one correction.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/2004/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/2004/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode820
as a start I'd take Graham Breed's microtonal thingy:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-02/msg00567.html
I don't recommend that; Felipe has been working on microtonal
notation support. See:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1278
and the discussion and
should I move retrograde into its own section now or is there a
volunteer who can improve the documentation on transpose and
inversion as well after pushing as is?
I'm happy to fix up the documentation, so I will
apply this as-is if I hear nothing contrary in the
near future.
thanks!
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of David Kastrup
)Sent: 22 February 2011 08:54
)To: lilypond-u...@gnu.org
)Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: Hidden
On 22 February 2011 15:27, Benkő Pál benko@gmail.com wrote:
as a start I'd take Graham Breed's microtonal thingy:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-02/msg00567.html
I don't recommend that; Felipe has been working on microtonal
notation support. See:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/2004/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/2004/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode820
Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely:820:
Graham Breed gbr...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 February 2011 15:27, Benkő Pál benko@gmail.com wrote:
as a start I'd take Graham Breed's microtonal thingy:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-02/msg00567.html
I don't recommend that; Felipe has been working on microtonal
as a start I'd take Graham Breed's microtonal thingy:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-02/msg00567.html
I don't recommend that; Felipe has been working on microtonal
notation support. See:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1278
and the discussion and
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/1003/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/1003/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode852
Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely:852:
Hi Boris,
I was looking at why
\markuplines{}
is dumping core, and came across code committed in
commit 4878fcdb04b335041f1440c8d31b0b4b80ecaea9
Author: Boris Shingarov shinga...@gmail.com
Prob *ps;
SCM list;
for (list = texts ; scm_is_pair (list) ; list = scm_cdr (list))
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Thurs 9am.
Assuming we want \markuplines { } to behave like \markup { } (i.e.,
produce a \null toplevel markup), then this patch works, since it
ensures a valid Paper_score in paper-book.cc:
Reviewers: Bertrand Bordage, mikesol_ufl.edu, joeneeman,
Message:
Thanks Joe!
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/diff/3018/lily/note-head.cc
File lily/note-head.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/diff/3018/lily/note-head.cc#newcode189
lily/note-head.cc:189: footnote
On
Pushed to git/origin/master 22 Feb 11
d245674e0266cde01a425317fa28aeb792ce589d
7230509dd005d9bbc7b2a7f0a064abc2de3b0ce6
plus doc changes
28c797d550d5557e75842c59a459aa48349e7ad5
94cce45d444cd6700d3f4df84cda68fb7de96cd7
Trevor
http://codereview.appspot.com/4173065/
Pushed to git/origin/master 22 Feb 11
d245674e0266cde01a425317fa28aeb792ce589d
7230509dd005d9bbc7b2a7f0a064abc2de3b0ce6
plus doc changes
28c797d550d5557e75842c59a459aa48349e7ad5
94cce45d444cd6700d3f4df84cda68fb7de96cd7
thanks again!
p
___
Graham, you wrote Sunday, February 20, 2011 10:07 PM
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:47:17PM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
make doc was failing for me with
TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [save size=5000].
I hacked etc/texmf/texmf.cnf to increase save size,
which allowed make doc to proceed, but
Hello
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Trevor Daniels
)Sent: 22 February 2011 16:27
)To: Graham Percival
)Cc: Lily-Devel List
)Subject: Re: pdfTex failure
)
)
I meant : we can't use this to do a footnote when in a markup or
markuplines.
Something like :
\markuplines { bla bla bla \footnote { Oh yes ? } bla bla bla }
I know lilypond-book is the best solution for this issue. But it would
be easier if LilyPond had a native support of these features.
Felipe,
I'm still far from digesting the whole, but this is really great work!
2. int vs Rational
Why not use a sequence of Rationals (rather than ints) to represent
the alteration?
If we use rational numbers, we can maintain backward compatibility.
The re-scaling of the alterations is
I cooked up something that more or less does the job. It's up on Rietveld.
Cheers,
MS
foo.ly
Description: Binary data
foo.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:24 PM, bordage.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
I meant : we can't use this to do a footnote when in a markup or
:p
Great job !
There's no word to thank you enough !
Thanks thanks thanks,
Bertrand
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2011/02/22 15:23:00, MikeSol wrote:
On 2011/02/22 01:05:49, joeneeman wrote:
Why not make the separator a (stencil-valued) property of the
paper-book?
I could, but currently, this patch employs its current stencil kludge
for the
following (perhaps-unfounded) reason. Please let me know
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 04:33:34PM +, James Lowe wrote:
Hello
)After increasing save size to 1 the doc build completed perfectly, so
)all is OK at the moment, but as I hacked a file which says don't hack this
)I guess it might revert back again after an update sometime in the future.
On Feb 22, 2011, at 7:17 PM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/02/22 15:23:00, MikeSol wrote:
On 2011/02/22 01:05:49, joeneeman wrote:
Why not make the separator a (stencil-valued) property of the
paper-book?
I could, but currently, this patch employs its current stencil kludge
for the
I've improved my patch. This line gives correct MIDI key signatures
for all plausibly authentic scenarios:
(apply + (map (lambda (p) (round (* (cdr p) 2))) pitch-list)) )
It would give the wrong result for a key signature with double sharps
or flats in 19 note equal temperament.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4149045/diff/6001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4149045/diff/6001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode2313
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:2313: signs. For
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+c_sorensen=byu@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+c_sorensen=byu@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Benkő Pál
[benko@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:11 PM
To: Felipe Gonçalves Assis
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
On Feb 22, 2011, at 7:17 PM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/02/22 15:23:00, MikeSol wrote:
On 2011/02/22 01:05:49, joeneeman wrote:
Have you checked the performance of this? This part is linear and so
it makes
29 matches
Mail list logo
