RE: MF fonts

2011-02-26 Thread James Lowe
Hello From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Tim Sheasby [t...@sheafpublishing.co.za] Sent: 26 February 2011 10:07 To: lilypond-u...@gnu.org Subject: MF fonts Need

RE: DOC: NR 1.5.2 Multiple voices - part combining (issue4188056)

2011-02-26 Thread James Lowe
Hello, From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of pkx1...@gmail.com [pkx1...@gmail.com] Sent: 26 February 2011 06:52 To: colinpkcampb...@gmail.com;

Re: MF fonts

2011-02-26 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 2/26/11 4:18 AM, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote: Hello From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Tim Sheasby [t...@sheafpublishing.co.za] Sent: 26

Re: MF fonts

2011-02-26 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 26 February 2011 17:11, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote: Finally, regarding your question about scaling note heads. It is possible to scale a note head differently in x and y if you are using it in a markup, but as far as I know, there is no way to scale it differently in x and y as

Re: MF fonts

2011-02-26 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 2/26/11 9:45 AM, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 February 2011 17:11, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote: Finally, regarding your question about scaling note heads. It is possible to scale a note head differently in x and y if you are using it in a markup, but as far

Re: Reduces algorithm time by prefinding footnoted grobs (issue4213042)

2011-02-26 Thread Neil Puttock
On 25 February 2011 22:53, mts...@gmail.com wrote: On 2011/02/25 20:37:37, Neil Puttock wrote: This reinvents the wheel a bit. :) (define-markup-command (draw-hline layout props)   ()   #:category graphic   #:properties ((draw-line-markup)                 (line-width))  

Re: DOC: NR 1.5.2 Multiple voices - part combining (issue4188056)

2011-02-26 Thread ColinPKCampbell
Actually thinking about it more would it make more sense to have the auto function listed first then add the words ... May need some manual adjustment.' and then list the rest? James I like that very much, James, thanks! A question for Reinhold, though: do I gather correctly that

Re: DOC: NR 1.5.2 Multiple voices - part combining (issue4188056)

2011-02-26 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
On 2011/02/26 20:01:39, Colin Campbell wrote: I like that very much, James, thanks! A question for Reinhold, though: do I gather correctly that \partcombine is applied to a Staff, and turns the combining mechanism on, while \partcombineAutomatic is applied to a single Voice? That being

Re: DOC: NR 1.5.2 Multiple voices - part combining (issue4188056)

2011-02-26 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Samstag, 26. Februar 2011, um 21:01:40 schrieben Sie: A question for Reinhold, though: do I gather correctly that \partcombine is applied to a Staff, and turns the combining mechanism on, while \partcombineAutomatic is applied to a single Voice? Not really. When part-combining does its

Re: improving the transition between full-length and shortened stems. (issue4210051)

2011-02-26 Thread Janek Warchoł
2011/2/25 hanw...@gmail.com LGTM just cosmetics. http://codereview.appspot.com/4210051/diff/1/lily/stem.cc File lily/stem.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4210051/diff/1/lily/stem.cc#newcode336 lily/stem.cc:336: SCM s = ly_assoc_get (ly_symbol2scm (lengths), details, SCM_EOL);

Re: improving the transition between full-length and shortened stems. (issue4210051)

2011-02-26 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
2011/2/26 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com: http://codereview.appspot.com/4210051/diff/1/lily/stem.cc#newcode360 lily/stem.cc:360: Real shortening_step = min (max (0.25, (shorten_property / 6)), 0.5); shouldnt 6 be 2*staff_radius+1 ? No, radius of default staff is 2, so 

Re: improving the transition between full-length and shortened stems. (issue4210051)

2011-02-26 Thread Janek Warchoł
2011/2/27 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com 2011/2/26 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com: http://codereview.appspot.com/4210051/diff/1/lily/stem.cc#newcode360 lily/stem.cc:360: Real shortening_step = min (max (0.25, (shorten_property / 6)), 0.5); shouldnt 6 be

Re: improving the transition between full-length and shortened stems. (issue4210051)

2011-02-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
well, 2*radius+2 then?  Anything that indicates how this number is formed is ok. Ah, sorry. I missed what you meant. Well, this nuber is not formed :) It shouldn't depend on staff_radius. This number determines what the steepness of transition should be (i.e., what the angle of the red