LGTM
I like this warning text. Much better.
Trevor
http://codereview.appspot.com/4278058/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2011/3/17 Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl:
Graham Percival schreef op do 17-03-2011 om 18:54 [+]:
Well, maybe somebody could spend 15 making this work, then we
wouldn't need to discuss it any more?
Please try the attached patch.
I have applied in my tree, removed python/*.pyc
2011/3/18 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
I have applied in my tree, removed python/*.pyc and 'make' still says
/usr/bin/python ../scripts/lilypond-book.py (...) usage.tely
(...)
File /home/fravd/source/lilypond/python/out/lilylib.py, line 57, in
encoded_write
f.write (s.encode
This changes correspond to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-03/msg00399.html
(You can see changes in fonts by running
mf '\mode:=proof; input feta-noteheads20'
gftodvi feta-noteheads20.2602gf
from /mf directory and comparing dvi files before and after a patch,
or
On 3/17/11, Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Graham Percival schreef op do 17-03-2011 om 18:54 [+]:
Well, maybe somebody could spend 15 making this work, then we
wouldn't need to discuss it any more?
Please try the attached patch. Also consider
I can build on the
2011/3/18 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
Janek,
I prefer the newer ones,
Glad to hear this!
although I doubt I'll use them too often in real music!
Me too :)
However, I was looking at my Gardner Read and think that, strictly, all the
flag shapes are a little wrong according to his
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: shortened flags affair, part 7 - downstem full-length 64th and
128th flags
2011/3/18 Phil Holmes
LGTM.
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273074/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 3/18/11 5:23 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Janek,
I prefer the newer ones, although I doubt I'll use them too often in real
music!
However, I was looking at my Gardner Read and think that, strictly, all the
flag shapes are a little wrong according to his rules. The
Janek Warchoł wrote Friday, March 18, 2011 11:41 AM
I've prepared flag touch-ups, including changes suggested by Carl.
They are here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273074/
I attach a simple proof-sheet showing these changes.
I prefer your suggested flags. Thanks.
Trevor
2011/3/18 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
In general I do agree with your approach of making our own decisions based
on what's published, rather than just following it. However, I do think the
current flags are inconsistent if you compare the up-stem quaver with the
semi-quaver. The
W dniu 18 marca 2011 14:26 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
c_soren...@byu.edu napisał:
I think Read's example flags are very inconsistent, so it's hard to decide
what the details of the flags should be. I've looked throughout his book,
and the flags change from occurrence to occurrence.
Indeed. I'd
On Mar 15, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
address@hidden wrote Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:00 PM
\relative c' { \time 3/4 { cis a'4 b fis'2 } \\ { d2. } }
Produces the attached output. Is there a way to get it so that the dot
does not collide with the notehead (w/o resorting to extra
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:39:26 -0700, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Keith OHara schreef op di 15-03-2011 om 23:09 [-0700]:
I tried to summarize what the relevant classes do, and indicated the
desired extensions in [[ ]] below :
Not really:
* midiChannelMapping = #'instrument
14 matches
Mail list logo
