Re: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread -Eluze
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: I could use some help from a developer who can do some testing on Windows 7 (64 bit?) SP1. See this bug: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1562 I'm trying to get this one nailed, and am getting a lot of help, but it's still very clumsy

git merge mess to sort out

2011-05-27 Thread Graham Percival
Hi guys, I'd like to be able to do git checkout master git merge stable/2.14 as implied by step 1 of post release on: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/minor-release-checklist This step is useful to get the news announcement of the release; I don't expect to see

Re: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: -Eluze elu...@gmail.com To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 12:49 PM Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7] Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: I could use some help from a developer who can do some testing on Windows 7 (64 bit?) SP1. See this

script for automatic missing emails

2011-05-27 Thread Graham Percival
Hi Phil, While I was compiling 2.13.62, I bashed out a quick script to parse bug-lilypond emails. Results for 2011 are here: http://lilypond.org/~graham/maybe-missing-emails.html Lots of bad style, missing features, etc -- but I think it's already useful enough to give an overview of the

Re: Vacation

2011-05-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:11:39PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: I will be on vacation from Monday May 30 through Saturday June 6. I expect to have no email during this time (I'll be camping on the beach of Lake Powell). http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=lake%20powellum=1tbm=isch Wow! That

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread James Lowe
Eluze, )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of eluze )Sent: 27 May 2011 13:37 )To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Phil Holmes )Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7] ) )Am

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread James Lowe
Hello, )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of James Lowe )Sent: 27 May 2011 14:29 )To: eluze; lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Phil Holmes )Subject: RE: developers on Windows

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread -Eluze
yes, that's exactly the example i have copied/pasted! Eluze pkx166h wrote: Hello, )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of James Lowe )Sent: 27 May 2011 14:29

2.13.62 regtests

2011-05-27 Thread Phil Holmes
Look good on the official site. Changes are: cue-clef-octavation.ly: Issue 877 beam-collision-large-object.ly: changed regtest skiptypesetting-multimeasurerest.ly: the numeral is closer to the rest; this looks good to me, although I'm not sure which fix caused it clef-oct.ly: Issue 877

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread James Lowe
Hello )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of -Eluze )Sent: 27 May 2011 15:29 )To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: RE: developers on Windows [7] ) ) )yes, that's

Re: script for automatic missing emails

2011-05-27 Thread Phil Holmes
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote in message news:banlktinou2tbmo+-d-7djhmcytdi8j5...@mail.gmail.com... Hi Phil, While I was compiling 2.13.62, I bashed out a quick script to parse bug-lilypond emails. Results for 2011 are here:

Re: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
James Lowe writes: OK I will need to test this specific windows version. One more question, did you apply SP1 as a separate Patch or did it 'come' preinstalled? Just one more question: I would very much like a bug report using a regular windows 7 SP1 installed in a virtual machine; so that

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread James Lowe
Jan )-Original Message- )From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:jann...@gnu.org] )Sent: 27 May 2011 15:41 )To: James Lowe )Cc: -Eluze; lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7] ) )James Lowe writes: ) ) OK I will need to test this specific windows version. ) ) One more

Re: script for automatic missing emails

2011-05-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: Neat. Is this autogenerated? Of course; see the scrape.py file that I attached. Is there an option to ignore some, or is it easier just to put in a spoof reply? Specific emails could be omitted, I guess... just like we omit

RE: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread -Eluze
i installed SP1 on 27th of April, i.e. a few months after having bought this computer. Eluze pkx166h wrote: Hello )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of

this silly bug about thinking non-cross-staff beams are cross-staff

2011-05-27 Thread Joe Neeman
Here's a patch: http://codereview.appspot.com/4564041 I don't think this has a specific bug number, although it's at least mentioned in the comments for 1043. Cheers, Joe ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: this silly bug about thinking non-cross-staff beams are cross-staff

2011-05-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 07:17:47PM +0300, Joe Neeman wrote: Here's a patch: http://codereview.appspot.com/4564041 I don't think this has a specific bug number, although it's at least mentioned in the comments for 1043. Thanks, added as

Re: developers on Windows [7]

2011-05-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
James Lowe writes: James, No problem. Although be aware that while I take the point of the virus scanner, the system I am 'testing' on at the moment to reproduce the problem is my work desktop and that has always had the same Virus Checker installed and the same version and this is not a MS

make doc

2011-05-27 Thread Phil Holmes
Question for GP really, but on the list to keep discussions public. Is the aim with make docs to try to make it silent, unless there are errors, like we have done with make website? I realise that to make this happen there will have to be lots of work to understand it better, but just trying

Spacing staves with dynamics between; issue 1442 (issue4536088)

2011-05-27 Thread k-ohara5a5a
Reviewers: , Message: Consider each minimum-distance and padding constraint, and choose spacing that meets the most demanding constraint. Previously some distances were added together by mistake in the within-system spacing; disagreeing with the documentation and with behavior for system-system

Re: make doc

2011-05-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: Is the aim with make docs to try to make it silent, unless there are errors, like we have done with make website? Yes. Ideally we should have no texinfo errors, no .ly errors, etc etc. I realise that to make this happen there will

Re: Spacing staves with dynamics between; issue 1442 (issue4536088)

2011-05-27 Thread k-ohara5a5a
Joe just pushed half of this, fixing 1442, so never mind for now. I'll merge and repost next weekend. http://codereview.appspot.com/4536088/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Spacing staves with dynamics between; issue 1442 (issue4536088)

2011-05-27 Thread joeneeman
On 2011/05/27 18:02:23, Keith wrote: Joe just pushed half of this, fixing 1442, so never mind for now. I'll merge and repost next weekend. Sorry, I didn't realize we were competing for this issue. But it seems like there's still an outstanding issue in the handling of minimum-distance together

Close or document the stretchability=0 backdoor?

2011-05-27 Thread Keith OHara
One of the special-cases in the LilyPond code is confusing me. ( This special-case code is in Page_layout_Problem::get_fixed_spacing(). ) If the flexible-vertical-spacing variable 'stretchability is defined, but has value 0.0, such as: *-*-spacing = #'((basic-distance . 16)

Re: Spacing staves with dynamics between; issue 1442 (issue4536088)

2011-05-27 Thread k-ohara5a5a
On 2011/05/27 19:42:47, joeneeman wrote: Sorry, I didn't realize we were competing for this issue. But it seems like there's still an outstanding issue in the handling of minimum-distance together with padding? I just put the regtest for this patch as issue 1668. I flagged that issue as

Re: Vacation

2011-05-27 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/27/11 6:29 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:11:39PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: I will be on vacation from Monday May 30 through Saturday June 6. I expect to have no email during this time (I'll be camping on the beach of Lake Powell).

Re: make doc

2011-05-27 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/27/11 11:40 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: Is the aim with make docs to try to make it silent, unless there are errors, like we have done with make website? I think this is true only if we set a silent

Re: git merge mess to sort out

2011-05-27 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/27/11 6:16 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: Hi guys, I'd like to be able to do git checkout master git merge stable/2.14 as implied by step 1 of post release on: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/minor-release-checklis t This

Re: git merge mess to sort out

2011-05-27 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/27/11 7:53 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote: On 5/27/11 6:16 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: Unfortunately, at the moment this produces a bunch of merge conflicts. Probably nothing serious, but it's an annoyance. Since it's been so long since the last