2011/7/17 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
On Sa., 16. Jul. 2011 21:05:37 CEST, Janek Warchoł
lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/16 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
2011/7/15 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
I think there should be an option to turn it all back on if you want
- a sort of inverse of QUIET_BUILD. We should also get rid of the
QUIET_BUILD variable completely.
Agreed. Maybe using the V=1 thing that Jan was
On So., 17. Jul. 2011 09:41:02 CEST, Jan Warchoł
lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/17 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
There is no particular reason I used a scaled regular clef, IIRC. We
might just as well use a scaled change
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hi,
breve glyphs in Feta font need modification.
What is bad now: breves lying between the stafflines form a
hard-to-recognize clump, partly because the corners (marked in orange
here:
2011/7/17 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com:
On So., 17. Jul. 2011 09:41:02 CEST, Jan Warchoł
lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/17 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
There is no particular reason I used a scaled regular
Hi all,
as acting Frog Meister i'm worried that nothing happens here :(
Wol, how can i help you?
Neil, Carl: do i understand correctly that Wol could've done this
using a more elegant solution, but nevertheless his patch doesn't
brake anything and works correctly (i don't remember any problems
On 2011/07/17 10:35:20, Janek Warchol wrote:
Hi all,
as acting Frog Meister i'm worried that nothing happens here :(
Wol, how can i help you?
Neil, Carl: do i understand correctly that Wol could've done this
using a more elegant solution, but nevertheless his patch doesn't
brake anything and
Hey all,
During a recent sudo make install I got this error. I'm not sure if it has to
do with recent pushes in the python code, but I figured I'd pass it along:
Compiling
/Users/mikesolomon/devel/lilypond/Documentation/out/notation/notation.texi...
- Original Message -
From: m...@apollinemike.com
To: philehol...@googlemail.com; percival.music...@gmail.com;
lilypond-devel@gnu.org; re...@codereview.appspotmail.com
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Adds redirect-lilypond-output option to
lilypond-book(issue4664060)
I've searched in note-head.cc, note-column.cc, note-heads-engraver.cc
but found nothing...
If i knew this i could probably fix
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1546
Thanks in advance,
Janek
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
- Original Message -
From: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
To: m...@apollinemike.com; philehol...@googlemail.com;
percival.music...@gmail.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org;
re...@codereview.appspotmail.com
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: Adds redirect-lilypond-output option
On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: m...@apollinemike.com
To: philehol...@googlemail.com; percival.music...@gmail.com;
lilypond-devel@gnu.org; re...@codereview.appspotmail.com
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Adds
2011/7/17 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
On 7/16/11 5:37 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 05:13:29PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
IMO, we should be aiming at one commit per Rietveld issue, rather than a
series of commits per Rietveld issue.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 03:59:37PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: m...@apollinemike.com
During a recent sudo make install I got this error. I'm not sure
if it has to do with recent pushes in the python code, but I
figured I'd pass it along:
Mike - is this only
LGTM. Maybe wait a day for Trevor to comment, then push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I've paired this down to a minimal implementation that only contains:
1) Init file stuff for syntax (this could be made much better...)
2) Modifications to the glissando engraver to ID glissando stems.
3) A function that links them up to glissandi in stem.hh
4) The triggering of this function
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1024
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1024: for top-level
2011/7/17 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
I've searched in note-head.cc, note-column.cc, note-heads-engraver.cc
but found nothing...
You don't need to know this (though if you're curious, any grob
without a default is set to ly:grob::stencil-width; see the
constructor in
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1105
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1105:
A way to make them not
http://codereview.appspot.com/4664070/diff/8001/lily/clef.cc
File lily/clef.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4664070/diff/8001/lily/clef.cc#newcode51
lily/clef.cc:51: str = str + _ + clef_style;
you can't add clef_style unless you know glyph == clefs.G
Pushed: cf2da187b5b99e963346e5944311bb77e2e52ff1
http://codereview.appspot.com/4664076/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1038
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1038: where the @code{\markup
Hello,
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of
mts...@gmail.com [mts...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 July 2011 19:22
To: pkx1...@gmail.com; gra...@percival-music.ca;
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:31 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I'm gonna pull this patch out of consideration - both you and Neil are right
about checking parents on an axis-by-axis basis. My desire to do this comes
from an incomplete understanding of what parent
2011/7/16 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
This is exactly the thin edge of the \override glyph
wedge I was worried about earlier :( We already have
too many overrides.
I think we shouldn't delete it immediately. We sometimes leave old
syntax for some time; let's keep old
LGTM
There is some code that adjusts for the shape of the notehead as well
(look for calls to
Note_head::stem_attachment_coordinate). Can you have a look if you can
work that into your code too?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4752048/
___
2011/7/17 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
I've searched in note-head.cc, note-column.cc, note-heads-engraver.cc
but found nothing...
I believe it defaults to ly:grob::stencil-width (probably in grob.cc).
Cheers,
Joe
___
27 matches
Mail list logo
