Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to coordina...@translationproject.org.)
A new POT file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4843043/diff/1/lily/slur-configuration.cc
File lily/slur-configuration.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4843043/diff/1/lily/slur-configuration.cc#newcode203
lily/slur-configuration.cc:203: height = min (generate_max_height
(state), height);
Thanks Xavier!
I think the \compoundMeter description should be more detailed.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1555
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Anybody interested in writing / modifying a scheme script to
indent scheme files? This is a much easier problem than C++ code.
No trolling intended (and I know this has been extensively discussed
before), but
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 9:42 PM, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Sunday evening...I am guessing this is routine maintenance.
Wow, I was doubting anyone would notice. Sorry for the downtime folks,
I have migrated everything to a new server and (most importantly) I'm
setting up the new
On 2011/08/02 21:29:24, Janek Warchol wrote:
It does the things i hoped for for ages :)
It merely restores the spacing rules LilyPond had through version
2.10.20 or so. See almost anything on mutopiaproject,
http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?id=994
I also see some
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:04:55AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Anybody interested in writing / modifying a scheme script to
indent scheme files? This is a much easier problem than C++ code.
No trolling
Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net writes:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Anybody interested in writing / modifying a scheme script to
indent scheme files? This is a much easier problem than C++ code.
No trolling intended (and I know
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:28 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Not all that impressive when we are talking mixed Lily/Scheme files. On
pure Scheme, things work better.
Indeed. That's what I was referring to.
When it comes to mixed scm/ly code, I think Frescobaldi has the
smartest
What is the general feeling about override/revert with nested
properties? The current implementation for property list of grob
properties maintains a data structure suitable for lazy updates of the
spine of the grob property list.
However, overrides for nested properties duplicate part of the
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of David Kastrup
)Sent: 03 August 2011 11:08
)To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Dealing with nested properties.
)
)
)What
James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com writes:
You already know that I am not capable of giving you the technical
answer you want, but as a 'joe user' having to list a dozen individual
overrides in my layout block or within the music itself is very
tedious.
But taking a specific and easy to
Anybody interested in writing / modifying a scheme script to
indent scheme files? This is a much easier problem than C++ code.
No trolling intended (and I know this has been extensively
discussed before), but doesn't GNU Emacs do an excellent job at it?
Not all that impressive when we are
Am Mittwoch, 3. August 2011, 16:39:59 schrieben Sie:
An example of some undesired ordering is the other example I sent a
few days
ago. The first system is utterly messed up (maybe a bug), but there
are also
other issues: The hairpin gets the footnote printed at the right
end, but
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:38:07PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
/Documentation/snippets -I /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/input/regression -I
/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/Documentation/included -I
/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/mf/out -I /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/mf/out -I
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:38:07PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
/Documentation/snippets -I
/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/input/regression -I
/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/Documentation/included -I
/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/mf/out -I
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:55:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/out/lybook-testdb$ for i in `cat
/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/out/lybook-testdb/snippet-names--1980013010.ly`;do
../bin/lilypond $i || { echo $i; break;
Get them here:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
cannot apply to master due to fixcc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4814041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
cannot apply to master due to fixcc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636081/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
sorry, unforutnately this patch cannot be applied to git master due to
fixcc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4807053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
awesome work, I really love this. Unfortunately it cannot apply
directly to git master due to fixcc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4822055/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
patch fails due to fixcc.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4626094/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Friday, 1pm PST.
Fix 1214: cueDuring and quoteDuring should also quote voices that
create subvoices
http://codereview.appspot.com/4816044/
font: change breve vertical lines
http://codereview.appspot.com/4748044
Remove special case in staff-spacing
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188051/
Add
LGTM, fantastic work as always.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4794057/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/fr.po
(We can arrange things so
nothing to see here, move along...
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_7.html
** Proposal summary
We shall treat developers (and contributors) as Independent
volunteers: each person does whatever they want, whenever they
want. We have busy careers and lives; we make no expectations of
action
Oh no! I hoped to get it on this countdown.
A version compatible with fixcc uploaded.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4636081/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
This patch is obsolete. Current patch is here
http://codereview.appspot.com/4800051/ and it is compatible with fixcc.
My bad... I should've closed this issue and sent a note.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4626094/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
2011/8/3 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Friday, 1pm PST.
Fix 1214: cueDuring and quoteDuring should also quote voices that
create subvoices
http://codereview.appspot.com/4816044/
font: change breve vertical lines
http://codereview.appspot.com/4748044
Remove special case in
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 10:37:18AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Actually, I read this first as bugs in undocumented features can't have
high priority, carrying the message if you don't document your new
feature, we refuse to make fixing problems with it a high priority.
I wasn't going for that
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 07:48:12AM +, Keith OHara wrote:
I'm curious first what we want the priority field to mean.
Probably we do not mean literally the priority with which contributors will
give attention to the bugs, because contributors are volunteers driven by
individual interest.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
Am Samstag, 30. Juli 2011, 18:28:32 schrieben Sie:
overall commment: the parts that do the reporting should not need to
know about the format of loglevel.
Which parts exactly do you mean? Those that call the
33 matches
Mail list logo
