k...@aspodata.se (Karl Hammar) writes:
Reinhold:
Am Tuesday, 23. August 2011, 22:30:24 schrieb David Kastrup:
...
Is this used anywhere?
A git grep didn't show any usage, but maybe I'm missing something.
Make does not complain about this patch (on my box).
- static string reverse
reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com writes:
Reviewers: ,
Message:
This patch fixes a memleak: Some temporary skylines were never
deleted...
Please review
Description:
Fix memleak: temporary skyline objects for systems were never deleted
Please review this at
On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/8/16 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
#2) sounds neat, but maybe Janek (who has spent some time messing
around with flags) wants to weigh in.
As i've said in a private mail to Mike, i don't have anything against doing
so.
Mike,
Hello,
2011/8/18 Sandor Spruit a.g.l.spr...@uu.nl
Hello,
I recently had an informal discussion with some collegues on the use of
SVG, in general.
They are in music research, I am a developer working on a completely
unrelated topic -
so please forgive me my ignorance w.r.t. music-related
2011/8/24 Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu:
Hey all,
I recently finished a new work for harpsichord and had forgotten about the
feta flag problem I reported before until I saw the printed output.
On Mac OS X, the output looks good (see attached).
you mean the pdf? It looks bad viewed on my
Hi Graham, Carl,
On Tue 23 Aug 2011 19:34:37 BST, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 8/23/11 12:21 PM, ianhuli...@gmail.com ianhuli...@gmail.com wrote:
LGTM
Maybe we should have some GOP rules for C++ about this?
Only have multiple exit points from routines if you absolutely have to.
Multiple
Ian Hulin ianhuli...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not asking for a grand re-write on this, but for single-exit to be
the preferred style for new code and patches where this would not
provoke changes on a GCR (Grand Code Re-write) scale.
I disagree. Structured exits decrease the level of nesting and
Am Wednesday, 24. August 2011, 10:49:30 schrieben Sie:
Hi Graham, Carl,
On Tue 23 Aug 2011 19:34:37 BST, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 8/23/11 12:21 PM, ianhuli...@gmail.com ianhuli...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe we should have some GOP rules for C++ about this?
Only have multiple exit points from
2011/8/24 Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu:
On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/8/16 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
#2) sounds neat, but maybe Janek (who has spent some time messing
around with flags) wants to weigh in.
As i've said in a private mail to Mike, i don't
On Aug 24, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/8/24 Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu:
On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/8/16 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
#2) sounds neat, but maybe Janek (who has spent some time messing
around with flags) wants to weigh
I let valgrind run lilypond (both with optimization turned on and off) on all
our regtests, and some of them (3-4) showed some warnings like invalid read
access or uninitialized values.
Shall I open a bug report for each regtest where valgrind shows a warning (the
guile GC warnings are of
On 2011-08-24, at 05:10 , Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Wednesday, 24. August 2011, 10:49:30 schrieben Sie:
Hi Graham, Carl,
On Tue 23 Aug 2011 19:34:37 BST, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 8/23/11 12:21 PM, ianhuli...@gmail.com ianhuli...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe we should have some GOP rules for
Dan Eble d...@faithful.be writes:
There can be a run-time performance difference between branching or
not branching. For the times you actually care, if you're not going
to use compiler-specific features to mark conditions as likely or
unlikely, you should test the likely case first so that
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 3:21 PM, ianhuli...@gmail.com wrote:
LGTM
Maybe we should have some GOP rules for C++ about this?
Can we not? Professionally, I work with an enormous style guide, and
having a lot of style prescribed needlessly complicates code reviews,
because it makes people hammer
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:38 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com writes:
Reviewers: ,
Message:
This patch fixes a memleak: Some temporary skylines were never
deleted...
Please review
Description:
Fix memleak: temporary skyline objects for systems were
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
Skylines are smobs. The usual way to delete them would be to
unprotect them once they have been registered by some
garbage-collectable object (or a SCM variable that is being used for
accessing them).
They are simple smobs, though, so this pattern
Hey all,
I'll be leaving on vacation in a week-ish, and as my summer-of-lily comes to a
close, I can likely do one more medium-scale thing before I have to start
correcting parallel fifths.
I'd like to work on broken beam slopes such that a beam can break across lines
and pick up where it left
Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu writes:
Hey all,
I'll be leaving on vacation in a week-ish, and as my summer-of-lily
comes to a close, I can likely do one more medium-scale thing before I
have to start correcting parallel fifths.
I'd like to work on broken beam slopes such that a beam can
On Aug 24, 2011, at 5:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu writes:
Hey all,
I'll be leaving on vacation in a week-ish, and as my summer-of-lily
comes to a close, I can likely do one more medium-scale thing before I
have to start correcting parallel fifths.
I'd like
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 02:08:41PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Shall I open a bug report for each regtest where valgrind shows a warning
(the
guile GC warnings are of course filtered out using a suppressions file)?
I wouldn't be surprised if you get some duplicate bugs, though --
I
Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu writes:
On Aug 24, 2011, at 5:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu writes:
I'll be leaving on vacation in a week-ish, and as my summer-of-lily
comes to a close, I can likely do one more medium-scale thing before I
have to start correcting
Am Mittwoch, 24. August 2011, 18:18:33 schrieben Sie:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 02:08:41PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Shall I open a bug report for each regtest where valgrind shows a warning
(the guile GC warnings are of course filtered out using a suppressions
file)?
I wouldn't be
Am Mittwoch, 24. August 2011, 15:38:21 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:38 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Skylines are smobs. The usual way to delete them would be to unprotect
them once they have been registered by some garbage-collectable object
(or a SCM
Running lilypond on a lot of files in one run, I observe that lilypond's
memory usage slowly goes up with time, i.e. it seems that lilypond does not
properly free all memory used for one score, before it starts with the next
one.
In particular, running lilypond on all 1010 regtests the output
Hi all,
i am on choral workshops for a week. I hope to be able to set up a
remote desktop to connect to my Lilydev-enabled machine and do some
work, but nevertheless my access to development process will be
limited.
Therefore please don't feel ignored if i answer only to some e-mails
for the
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:57 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
Skylines are smobs. The usual way to delete them would be to
unprotect them once they have been registered by some
garbage-collectable object (or a SCM variable that is being used
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4672059/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Pierre THIERRY writes:
[cc lilypond-devel]
If memory serves, so far we have US$200, C$100 and €200. If I were to
work alone on this bounty, that would allow me to allocate
approximately 20hrs, which should clearly be enough to write a nice
XML exporting in some schema mimicking Lilypond's
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Pierre THIERRY writes:
[cc lilypond-devel]
If memory serves, so far we have US$200, C$100 and €200. If I were to
work alone on this bounty, that would allow me to allocate
approximately 20hrs, which should clearly
On 2011/08/08 22:09:09, Trevor Daniels wrote:
LGTM
Although I'm not sure about editing the other language files. Best
wait for
Francisco to comment.
Francisco, can you tell me if this patch is ok to go as I have touched
some of the translated docs to remove this snippet.
Thanks
On 24 August 2011 22:26, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
No complaints from last time, with the possible exception of Neil
wanting a different behavior for (else...)
I haven't had time to test it thoroughly since my last comments, but
there are some other issues which will need
On 2011/08/08 22:09:09, Trevor Daniels wrote:
LGTM
Although I'm not sure about editing the other language files. Best
wait for
Francisco to comment.
Francisco, can you tell me if this patch is ok to go as I have touched
some of
the translated docs to remove this snippet.
Thank
http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/17001/lily/flag.cc
File lily/flag.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4922042/diff/17001/lily/flag.cc#newcode147
lily/flag.cc:147: what style of flag glyph is typeset on a
what
Am Wednesday, 24. August 2011, 23:33:02 schrieb Michael Ellis:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
It's only about an hour of work (see below) to convert a simple and
prepared .ly score to musicxml, see below.
That sounds encouraging. So how far away
Hi all,
In short, the only way to make it extendable for the future (so
that one day we can also export the layout) is to handle (MusicXML) export
similar to MIDI generation, namely via translators that collect all events
and
all settings as they appear in the score.
+1.
KMac.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi all,
In short, the only way to make it extendable for the future (so
that one day we can also export the layout) is to handle (MusicXML)
export
similar to MIDI generation, namely via translators
On 8/24/11 5:31 PM, Michael Ellis michael.f.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi all,
In short, the only way to make it extendable for the future (so
that one day we can also export the layout) is to handle
Hi Carl,
Do you want
1) XML that captures only the music (and could be imported into some other
program which will make the layout decisions)?
No: this is trivial to obtain from #2 or #3, via XSLT.
2) XML that captures both the music and the layout (and could therefore be
printed by some
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Do you want
1) XML that captures only the music (and could be imported into some other
program which will make the layout decisions)?
No: this is trivial to obtain from #2 or #3, via XSLT.
You are using trivial like a mathematician,
On 8/24/11 6:00 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
Hi Carl,
My question is this: In what format is the final, typeset music stream such
that extracting the music information only would be massively easier than
extracting the music and layout information?
I don't
David,
No: this is trivial to obtain from #2 or #3, via XSLT.
You are using trivial like a mathematician, strictly interchangeable with
doable.
Actually, I was using trivial in two ways:
1. As a mathematician (yes, I've had several papers published in peer-reviewed
journals), I was — as you
Am Sunday 14 August 2011, 17:31:11 schrieb David Kastrup:
a) a revert will only cancel the last _matching_ override, and the match
includes the complete specified property path, _and_ the prospective
use of \once. \revert will not cancel \once\override and vice versa.
b) At the end of a
For Friday, August 26 (and where did the Summer go?)
Issue 509 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=509:
collision nested tuplet numbers - R Issue 4808082
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/: Prevents nested tuplets from
colliding.
Issue 1328
On 2011-08-24, at 09:25 , David Kastrup wrote:
Modern compilers pay very little attention to how you arrange the source
code of equivalent constructs.
My experience trying to finagle optimized code out of gcc was more than a year
ago, and the compiler was probably a bit older than that (not
44 matches
Mail list logo
