Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Thursday, 22. September 2011, 01:55:15 schrieb David Kastrup:
yep, happens about 10% of the time for me. Running make again
fixes it. (almost always -- the chance of two failing runs is
about 1%. That's happened twice to me that I can
Pushed as 829f0ded77ee44ea6f0566fb5e5318802a8857ad.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5030053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Graham Percival writes:
+1
Automatic indentation *does* solve real problems.
My point exactly: use Emacs.
Gee, I wonder why we haven't seen any more patches from that new
contributor?
/sarcasm
This looks like a contributor who needs some guidance. The first thing
I notice is
Graham Percival writes:
Yep. I'd describe it as three websites
It's a royal mess.
There is some value in having issues.google.com than only a bugs mailing
list, but there is indeed also a cost.
Any ideas on how to deal with people who only want to deal with
email?
We may want to have a
I'd like to add a note to this effect in the CG - anyone object?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: pkx1...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net; Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:05 AM
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with make
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
pkx1...@gmail.com pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:13:00PM
- Original Message -
From: Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Cc: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with make
Am Thursday, 22. September 2011, 01:55:15 schrieb David Kastrup:
yep, happens
On Sep 22, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
Yep. I'd describe it as three websites
It's a royal mess.
There is some value in having issues.google.com than only a bugs mailing
list, but there is indeed also a cost.
Any ideas on how to deal with
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
Cc: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net; carl.d.soren...@gmail.com;
Aleksandr Andreev aleksandr.andr...@gmail.com;
lemzw...@googlemail.com; reinhold.kainho...@gmail.com;
James, could you put this through the ringer? It's on patch countdown
and I don't really trust my regtesting abilities all too much.
Thanks.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Am Thursday, 22. September 2011, 09:58:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
I only get such a problem if I call make -j3 (or something other
1). I have never experienced it with make, so my guess would be
that the dependencies of our texinfo files
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@kainhofer.com
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Cc: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with make
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:13AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Overnight i tried making doc on current master and it failed too.
ef8dd3eaee73588faf1a6687407a6fda60cff591
worked perfectly in ubuntu 10.04 (not quite lilydev) for me a few
hours ago.
David,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:37 AM, d...@gnu.org wrote:
James, could you put this through the ringer? It's on patch countdown
and I don't really trust my regtesting abilities all too much.
Thanks.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
No problem, I'll update the tracker to
Hello,
I'm getting the following error when I tried to 'make' this morning.
--snip--
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/ly/string-tunings-init.ly:128:0: error:
syntax error, unexpected MUSIC_FUNCTION
\makeDefaultStringTunings #defaultStringTunings
]
[/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/ly/property-init.ly]
Update done.
I think the C part is ok.
There's maybe a few things to change in the doc.
Shall I wait for a countdown or push directly?
Bertrand
http://codereview.appspot.com/4917044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On my new machine, I get:
phil@Ubuntu:~/lilypond-git$ git push --dry-run
To ssh://philhol...@git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond.git
! [rejected]master - master (non-fast-forward)
error: failed to push some refs to
'ssh://philhol...@git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond.git'
To prevent you from
Janek
2011/9/22 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
I know that Aleks uses Ubuntu Natty (not Lilydev).
I use Lilydev - probably not the newest version, how can i check it?
System - Administration - System Monitor click on the first tab : )
That's the GUI way.
You can also do some
On 22 September 2011 12:48, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
We probably need to learn how to use git bisect...
It's David's most recent commit: 6c3445a0791831d450573cf583da36aecac5322c
Cheers,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
- Original Message -
From: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
To: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:44 PM
Subject: Problem with git push
On my new machine, I get:
phil@Ubuntu:~/lilypond-git$ git push --dry-run
To
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
I'm getting the following error when I tried to 'make' this morning.
--snip--
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/ly/string-tunings-init.ly:128:0: error:
syntax error, unexpected MUSIC_FUNCTION
Am bisecting right now,
I'm just trying to push a single commit on master.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Bertrand Bordage
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org ; David Kastrup
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
You can specify what
The commit you want to push must follow origin/master.
If it does, just do:
git push --dry-run origin [hash_of_the_commit]:master
This will push this single commit.
If not, you have to rebase so that the commit follows origin/master:
git rebase -i origin
An editor opens, where you can change the
Hi Phil,
Janek, Aleksandr - could you confirm what system you're getting make doc
failing on?
Yes, I'm running Ubuntu Natty (not Lilydev).
More specifically, Linux sasha-desktop 2.6.38-11-generic #48-Ubuntu
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Aleks
___
Some concerns and a handful of questions (as usual in my case).
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096050/diff/1/python/musicexp.py
File python/musicexp.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096050/diff/1/python/musicexp.py#newcode63
python/musicexp.py:63: self.print_verbatim ('\\version
I've just used lily-git to do a hard reset of my git, reapplied the changes,
recommitted and redone the push --dry-run and am still getting the same error.
I'm not quite sure what it means for commit you want to push must follow
origin/master but it's definitely the sole commit which is on the
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
I've just used lily-git to do a hard reset of my git, reapplied the changes,
recommitted and redone the push --dry-run and am still getting the same
error. I'm not quite sure what it means for commit you want to push must
follow origin/master but
Welcome to the wonderful world of LilyPond development!
Most changes look fine, but there are some things that can't be
submitted yet. See my comments.
Most important: Please edit the source file in scripts/musicxml2ly.py
and don't modify the installed musicxml2ly file and copy it over to the
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Bertrand Bordage bordage.bertr...@gmail.com; David Kastrup
d...@gnu.org; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
Am Donnerstag, 22. September 2011, 13:44:20 schrieb Phil Holmes:
On my new machine, I get:
phil@Ubuntu:~/lilypond-git$ git push --dry-run
To ssh://philhol...@git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond.git
! [rejected]master - master (non-fast-forward)
error: failed to push some refs to
There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first is
shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes missing.
I've attached a crop of the difference between 2.15.12 and 2.15.10 - 2.15.12
is in red. You'll see that the 1 on the top of the note in bar 5 has
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first
is shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes
missing. I've attached a crop of the difference between 2.15.12 and
2.15.10 - 2.15.12 is in red. You'll see that
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first
is shown
- Original Message -
From: Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com
Simply fetch from the server:
git pull --rebase
Well, I was sure I must have done that at one point, but I've done it now
and success :-) Thanks Reinhold.
--
Phil Holmes
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
There are 2 significant problems
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com; Devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org; lilypond-user lilypond-u...@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: building
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com; Devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org; lilypond-user lilypond-u...@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September
- Original Message -
From: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
To: Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
- Original Message -
From: Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
To: Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
- Original Message -
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Exactly. Make copies the *.texi file from the source to the build dir, runs
extract-texi-filenames.py and then removes it again...
Ouch. Is there any compelling reason to
1) not run extract-texi-filename.py on the original
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Exactly. Make copies the *.texi file from the source to the build dir, runs
extract-texi-filenames.py and then removes it again...
Ouch. Is there any compelling reason to
On 22 September 2011 17:38, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:46:38PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12.
Could we get issues for these? I should probably cancel the
release countdown.
I can't verify
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: pkx1...@gmail.com; Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with make
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes
On 9/21/11 10:29 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/21 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
Reviews in Google Code are done on branches, and each commit on the branch
is visible and reviewable.
Looks interesting, however i seem to be unable to add comments -
probably
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Couldn't find a tracker issue for this, however it passes make and reg
tests.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4917044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5090045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'd
Hi all,
my daughter plays the harp (2nd year), but has some difficult to read the music
notation: she is dyslexic. His difficulty consists in identify correctly the
symbols, so a G may be a B or viceversa.
An idea should be to use different colors (for pdf), e.g. B=violet, A=brown, and
so on...
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Mauro mrossol...@yahoo.it wrote:
Hi all,
my daughter plays the harp (2nd year), but has some difficult to read the
music
notation: she is dyslexic. His difficulty consists in identify correctly the
symbols, so a G may be a B or viceversa.
An idea
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Mauro mrossol...@yahoo.it wrote:
Hi all,
my daughter plays the harp (2nd year), but has some difficult to read the
music
notation: she is dyslexic. His difficulty consists in identify correctly the
symbols, so a G may be a B or viceversa.
An idea
Pushed as 83055a30e52c14b0fd49d6df3eb1c7af476ecb4b
http://codereview.appspot.com/5023044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:23:00AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
Gee, I wonder why we haven't seen any more patches from that new
contributor?
/sarcasm
This looks like a contributor who needs some guidance.
Yes.
It should suffice to say: please fix
Since it has C changes as well, I'd prefer it to go through a countdown.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4917044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:49:56AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
Any ideas on how to deal with people who only want to deal with
email?
We may want to have a look at the new http://bugs.gnu.org ,
an implementation of debbugs.
Hmm, clunky user interface.
My
2011/9/22 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:49:56AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
Any ideas on how to deal with people who only want to deal with
email?
We may want to have a look at the new http://bugs.gnu.org ,
an
2011/9/22 Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com:
Janek
2011/9/22 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
I use Lilydev - probably not the newest version, how can i check it?
System - Administration - System Monitor click on the first tab : )
It says
janek-lilydev5 (that's my username and virtual
Am Thursday, 22. September 2011, 21:42:14 schrieb Peekay Ex:
if it is of any use, the last 3 patches I have just tested for David,
none gave me make failures at all. I even did two of them again twice,
just to see if it was a fluke. So it seems to be the 'type' of files
that get patched
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:52:36PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
That's all just speculation, though, based on experience and gut feeling.
Based on my spectulation and gut feeling from seeing this off and
on for the past IIRC 1.5 years, it happens more often when you're
building from an
FWIW, I updated my kernel by installing the latest Ubuntu updates. I
also did a git rebase. I still get the same problem.
A
2011/9/22 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2011/9/22 Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com:
Janek
2011/9/22 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
I use Lilydev -
Hi Bertrand,
2011/9/23 Bertrand Bordage bordage.bertr...@gmail.com:
Hi everyone,
I started working on automatic hyphenation (see the attached PDF).
I rewrote wordwrap-stencils into a wordwrap-markups and it works great, but
I do have a question before continuing.
Do you think I should start
2011/9/22 Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com:
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Mauro mrossol...@yahoo.it wrote:
Hi all,
my daughter plays the harp (2nd year), but has some difficult to read the
music
notation: she is dyslexic. His difficulty consists in identify correctly the
symbols, so
Get my github lilypond-extra repository:
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra
then look at:
auto-compile/compile-lilypond-test.py
follow the instructions to set up your ramdisk (700 megs or 2048
megs, depending on whether you want to bother with the docs or
not), then run it:
python
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 00:52:24 schrieb Graham Percival:
It automatically keeps track of the last known good compile, so
if it ever fails, you know that somebody did something naughty
since the last time you ran it. No guessing about well, I think
I compiled it last night at around
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:03:08AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 00:52:24 schrieb Graham Percival:
It automatically keeps track of the last known good compile, so
if it ever fails, you know that somebody did something naughty
since the last time you ran it.
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 01:12:13 schrieben Sie:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:03:08AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
FWIW, I'm rebuilding binaries and docs from scratch every night on my
office machine to create the docs on http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond, so
we already have some kind
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:30:47AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 01:12:13 schrieben Sie:
- you're not building them from scratch
I am. I nuke the build dir before each build.
oh, good! I didn't realize that. :)
- you don't keep a record of which
While we are at it: the docs compilation failed tonight...
Unfortunately, the output does not give any error message, so I have no idea
what is wrong.
Cheers,
Reinhold
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Betreff: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2011.09.23-03:32)
Datum: Friday, 23.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:35:26AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
While we are at it: the docs compilation failed tonight...
Thanks!
Unfortunately, the output does not give any error message, so I have no idea
what is wrong.
Well, the output contains this:
...
fatal error: failed files:
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie:
fatal error: failed files: be/lily-48175def.ly
A decent build system would take that filename, grep it for
\sourcefilename, and tell us *that*
Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes:
There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first is
shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes missing.
Confirming. The missing fingering indication is hidden under a note head
in the other voice. The
Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes:
I've not been able to check much more, because of subtle differences between
the treble clef in 15.12 and 15.10, but that's a starter.
But the G clef changed between .8 and .9
___
lilypond-devel mailing
Hello again..
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie:
fatal error: failed files: be/lily-48175def.ly
A decent
75 matches
Mail list logo
