Reviewers: dak,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
Build: Remove .PRECIOUS flags.
Since 820c7ff5d380e8ca52057717ab3176b5e40107fd all files are treated as
.SECONDARY files. This means that `make' will not delete files that it
identifies as intermediate files, which would be it's default
Reviewers: dak,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
Build: Don't use immediate expansion of variable.
For out-of-source builds, get rid of this warning:
ls: cannot access ../../Documentation/snippets/*.ly: No such file
Ref: http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-devel@gnu.org/msg42975.html
LGTM, please push to staging immediately.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5689058/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM. If David agrees, then I support pushing this to staging
immediately.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5688059/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2012/02/21 10:36:08, Graham Percival wrote:
LGTM. If David agrees, then I support pushing this to staging
immediately.
The claim is that declaring files as .SECONDARY is enough for not
having them cleaned up unnecessarily (and likely in conflict with
parallel makes). After reading the
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:26:36 +0100
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
On 20/02/2012 14:44, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
On 20/02/2012 14:18, Nils wrote:
my pusblisher wants baroque figured bass gylphs. They have the strokes in
different places than the Lilypond versions.
I
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
I didn't manage to fix:
filtering-parts-from-the-command-line.ly
You just did not try hard enough. It was a really obscure bug in the
lexer. I'll commit a fix to staging once make check goes through.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:49:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Uh, Graham? Just fixed another regression discovered by an LSR failure
and pushed to staging. It would appear that this needs to be in 2.16
according to our policies.
Well, there's already 2 Critical issues, and I think that 2335
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
See here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/examples
This seems to me to be a hangover to the days when the web site didn't have
the nice examples on
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web/examples. It seemed
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:49:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Uh, Graham? Just fixed another regression discovered by an LSR failure
and pushed to staging. It would appear that this needs to be in 2.16
according to our policies.
Well,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:40:26PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I just bungled staging with bad Texinfo in a regtest and saw that you
merged into it right after that, presumably because of a release. I can
either replace the merge (it will no longer have the same commit id) or
throw it out
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Feb 20, 2012, at 1:58 AM, Joe Neeman wrote:
By the way, could you update your git branch please?
Will do once we finish this exchange I get a clean version up.
I will check my test files once you do this;
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:40:26PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I just bungled staging with bad Texinfo in a regtest and saw that you
merged into it right after that, presumably because of a release. I can
either replace the merge (it will no
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:56 PM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 16.02.2012 um 13:02 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys
What happens if you take a fully formatted file from Finale and load
it into Sibelius via the musicxml route, and the reverse? Is anyone
able to post the before and after PDFs of
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:22 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Feb 19, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:59 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
I've now optimized the crap out of
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Janek Warchoł
janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Please give your suggested projects.
In another thread Han-Wen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, nowadays, fontforge supports Python scripting. We could redo
Am 21.02.2012 um 22:04 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:56 PM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 16.02.2012 um 13:02 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys
What happens if you take a fully formatted file from Finale and load
it into Sibelius via the musicxml route, and the reverse? Is
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:41 PM, pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Yes, you're right. But I'd say the other results are also interesting
because they show that the same .xml-file is represented differently by
different notation softwares (e.g. concerning page breaks , lyrics...)
Sure; it's far
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:51:03PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Why is your organization applying to participate in Google Summer of
Code 2012? What do you hope to gain by participating?
Most importantly: more
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:39:28PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
I think FSF/GNU project can and has acted as organization in the past.
I guess so. GSoC FAQ says this:
5. What tax related documentation is required
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:57:54PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
oh, I see. That was actually a clean-up from 2.15.30, because the
tag got lost because release/unstable didn't merge into master
properly. (why? no clue; I just followed the
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:39:28PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I'm not familiar with IRS forms, but i guess the umbrella
organizations part concerns us and FSF/GNU.
Shall i contact FSF or maybe someone who is
On 2012/02/14 18:48:42, Graham Percival wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5665047/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode515
Documentation/web/community.itexi:515: @helpusAdvanced
I'm ok with this change, but the @helpusProjects should be in a
@divClass{column-center-bottom}.
On
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:53:52PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Maybe wait 12 hours in case somebody else wants to do it, then try
to contact the FSF yourself. Applications start tomorrow and only
run for a
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the Italian team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/it.po
(We can arrange things so
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
In another thread Han-Wen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, nowadays, fontforge supports Python scripting. We could redo all
the craziness involving generated
For 20:00 MST Thursday, February 23
Enhancement:
Issue 2319
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2319: Patch:
WebCG: remove projects from HelpUs - R 5665047
http://codereview.appspot.com/5665047/
Issue 2336
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2336: Patch:
Somewhat independently, there is a mf2pt1.pl Perl script that
(shudder) generates .pe script to transform a metapost output to a
Type 1 font. I guess that could be done more concisely directly as
a python script.
This sounds like a very nice addition. Maybe generating Python should
be the
28 matches
Mail list logo
