As one can see in
URL:https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7355, LilyPond
plugins are not considered safe to use in Wikimedia because of Denial of
Service concerns.
However, a sizable number of contributors could likely be expected to
actually run LilyPond on their own computer. So
http://codereview.appspot.com/5729051/diff/6001/lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc
File lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5729051/diff/6001/lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc#newcode93
lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc:93: if (!scm_is_pair (axis_groups_) ||
!scm_is_pair
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 10:48:28PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Graham, i understand that you'll be our project administrator. When
Ideas List will be up, you'll have to register at
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:13 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
As one can see in
URL:https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7355, LilyPond
plugins are not considered safe to use in Wikimedia because of Denial of
Service concerns.
However, a sizable number of contributors could
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:22:42PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
What happens about the tax form? I'm not signing any legal
document unless I'm certain it's the right thing. Is GNU
submitting that foreign
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Let's see if we can rescue this somehow.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:52:00AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
No. Put the patch on
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
We now have zero Critical issues, so I'd like to have another
release canddiate. Unfortunately, there is still at least one
issue to verify in the list for 2.15.31, so I will not make a
release.
Mike all,
i did a quick compile with patchset 36 and unfortunately didn't notice
significant speedups from previous version.
Compilation time differences vary widely depending on music (from 5% to
100% longer)
PROCESSING ../dynamics.ly WITH MASTER: --
real0m0.762s
user
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:14:29 -0800
Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't use ly:axis-group-interface::add-element, because stems don't
implement the axis-group-interface. (Removing this will also remove
the
Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I'm interested to improve the pace and quality of development of
Lilypond for MacOS X. I'd like to know if the developers are
supportive of this, and get your advice on how to best direct my
efforts.
First, a few statements to solicit
Reviewers: Graham Percival, carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com, MikeSol, lemzwerg,
Reinhold, joeneeman,
Message:
Please review asap, it's only a couple days left before application
deadline.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File
Official regtests are nice and clean.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
A few comments on the text, but otherwise LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode83
At 17:01 on 06 Mar 2012, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviewers: Graham Percival, carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com, MikeSol,
lemzwerg, Reinhold, joeneeman,
Message:
Please review asap, it's only a couple days left before application
deadline.
line 912: s/counfusing/confusing/
--
Mark Knoop
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:01:44PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Oh, by the way, Google's first hit for LilyPond download is
URL:http://lilypond.org/web/install/ which states When we have
whetted your appetite for LilyPond, then this is the right page.
Unfortunately, it is the wrong page since
If you add a new section to the website without changing the relevant
part of Documentation/lilypond-texi2html.init, the colors will get
messed up. See line 1516.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):
New patchset.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:36 PM, gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
If you add a new section to the website without changing the relevant
part of Documentation/lilypond-texi2html.init, the colors will get
messed up. See line 1516.
done.
Actually, i think that one entry was already
Looks pretty good to me.
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/5001/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/5001/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode1012
Fixed
http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/5001/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/5001/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode1012
Documentation/web/community.itexi:1012: @subheading Better
LGTM. Wait another few hours (until 21:00 or 22:00 UST), then push to
staging. If you're going to bed before then, go ahead and push to
staging earlier. If there's problems that aren't noticed before you
push it, we can fix the page later. Make sure it's in staging before
James runs patch
Hello,
I've just been seeing if Ubuntu 12.04 is going to cause any
significant problems for the next major LilyDev upgrade.
I had no problems at all.
12.04 is still in beta
1.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/TechnicalOverview/Beta1#Download_the_Beta_1
This was the image I used
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
I've just been seeing if Ubuntu 12.04 is going to cause any
significant problems for the next major LilyDev upgrade.
checking gcc version... 4.6.3
Wow. It was released on March 1 or so IIRC.
--
David Kastrup
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've just been seeing if Ubuntu 12.04 is going to cause any
significant problems for the next major LilyDev upgrade.
[...]
make and make doc work fine (well make doc completes with no errors I
haven't actually looked
Hello,
2012/3/6 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've just been seeing if Ubuntu 12.04 is going to cause any
significant problems for the next major LilyDev upgrade.
[...]
make and make doc work fine (well make
Francisco,
On 5 March 2012 23:41, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/5 James pkx1...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Just in case anyone was interested. Thanks to whoever sorted this out
- it used to be 2.11 or even 2.10 not so many months ago.
330.7 MB to download, 905.2 MB when
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:22 PM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
2012/3/6 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Maybe LilyDev 2.0 should be Ubuntu 12.04.
No we have to think about GUB and the fact that 12.04 is still in
beta. I think as has been suggested by Graham that we'll do
2012/3/6 janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
Mike all,
i did a quick compile with patchset 36 and unfortunately didn't notice
significant speedups from previous version.
Could you try the dev/jneem branch in git? It has some optimizations. If
that doesn't help, could you please send me some of the
2012/3/6 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
The only thing that concerns me is xterm. Do i understand correctly
that it's the only available terminal? The default one in current
LilyDev is much better, has tabs and all eye-candy a terminal can
have.
What does Ctrl+Alt+T do?
--
For 20:00 MST Thursday March 8
Issue 2376 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2376:
Automatic footnotes on \null markups causes unexpected results - R
5755058 http://codereview.appspot.com/5755058/
Cheers,
Colin
--
Every man is a damned fool for at least five minutes
On 6 March 2012 21:36, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Francisco,
On 5 March 2012 23:41, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/5 James pkx1...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Just in case anyone was interested. Thanks to whoever sorted this out
- it used to be 2.11 or even 2.10 not so
Hello
2012/3/6 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
2012/3/6 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
The only thing that concerns me is xterm. Do i understand correctly
that it's the only available terminal? The default one in current
LilyDev is much better, has tabs and all eye-candy a
http://codereview.appspot.com/5729051/diff/6001/lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc
File lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5729051/diff/6001/lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc#newcode35
lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc:35: these four contexts.
On 2012/03/04 21:35:57,
http://codereview.appspot.com/5755058/diff/1/lily/page-breaking.cc
File lily/page-breaking.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5755058/diff/1/lily/page-breaking.cc#newcode584
lily/page-breaking.cc:584: }
Just a C++ question - do these lines implicitly call the copy
constructor to create
pushed as cc5223ac26a5713c5901c02edf2868c26be10542.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: MikeSol,
http://codereview.appspot.com/5755058/diff/1/lily/page-breaking.cc
File lily/page-breaking.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5755058/diff/1/lily/page-breaking.cc#newcode584
lily/page-breaking.cc:584: }
On 2012/03/07 07:30:42, MikeSol wrote:
Just a C++ question - do
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/6 janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
Mike all,
i did a quick compile with patchset 36 and unfortunately didn't notice
significant speedups from previous version.
Could you try the dev/jneem branch in git? It has some
36 matches
Mail list logo
