Re: rall. and accel stopped working in articulate. (issue 5927044)

Peter, this has passed our 'countdown' review, if you don't yet have push access you can email me a git-formatted patch and I can push it for you. James http://codereview.appspot.com/5927044/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:57:37AM +0100, James wrote: > I've updated LilyDev and been working with it this week testing the > basics - it makes the code and the doc. I've given Mike a copy of the > iso (as he was the only one I knew who used LilyDev in anger) actually, all official lilypond relea

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

Hello, On 30 March 2012 02:24, Graham Percival wrote: ... >> >> Well, currently I can't self-compile LilyPond or prepare a formal >> patch or sth else in this direction. >> Seems I have to learn a lot. ;) > > Yep.  To warn you: at the moment the "quick start" section of the > CG is broken; follo

Re: lilypond-book: Set include path for --output option (issue 2423). (issue 5846075)

LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/5846075/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

PATCH: Countdown to 20120331

For 20:00 MDT Saturday March 31 (Let's avoid the temptation of counting down to April first, shall we?) Enhancement: Issue 2448 : Patch: Provide better debugging messages of undead live objects. - R5955046

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:03:40AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > Am 30. März 2012 01:51 schrieb Graham Percival : > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:02:50AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > >> Am 30. März 2012 00:12 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna : > >> >> _All_ "Unknown files" are from `Documentation/snippets/

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

Am 30. März 2012 02:03 schrieb Thomas Morley : > Am 30. März 2012 01:51 schrieb Graham Percival : >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:02:50AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: >>> Am 30. März 2012 00:12 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna : >>> >> _All_ "Unknown files" are from `Documentation/snippets/new' as >>> >> requ

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

Am 30. März 2012 01:51 schrieb Graham Percival : > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:02:50AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: >> Am 30. März 2012 00:12 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna : >> >> _All_ "Unknown files" are from `Documentation/snippets/new' as >> >> requested by the Contributors Guide. >> >> see: >> >> ht

Re: LSR is now on 2.14

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:02:50AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > Am 30. März 2012 00:12 schrieb Sebastiano Vigna : > >> _All_ "Unknown files" are from `Documentation/snippets/new' as > >> requested by the Contributors Guide. > >> see: > >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/up

Re: Lilypond-auto - newsgroup?

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:31:11PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > I'm subscribed to -auto as a mailing list, but for stuff like this, > it fits my workflow better as a newsgroup. Bugs and devel are also > newsgroups on the gmane server, but I can't find auto. Should it be > there? I have no objecti

LSR is now on 2.14

Hi, the LSR is now using 2.14 ! For testing I added a new file: "test for the new version (2.14.2)" Of course this should be not approved. :) Worked fine. I noticed some problems: Sebastiano or better his LSR-set-up-code was puzzled by the files from `Documentation/snippets/new' which I had integ

Lilypond-auto - newsgroup?

I'm subscribed to -auto as a mailing list, but for stuff like this, it fits my workflow better as a newsgroup. Bugs and devel are also newsgroups on the gmane server, but I can't find auto. Should it be there? -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-devel ma

Attic: Announce for 2.14, descriptive changes for 1.6 - 2.14 (issue 5956046)

LGTM, please push directly to staging. (patchy staging-merge is good enough; no need to wait for test-patches) http://codereview.appspot.com/5956046/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypon

Re: Point and Click also into the MIDI file

Wilbert Berendsen writes: > Op Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:41:18 + (UTC) > Silvio Ardito schreef: > >> Dear Sirs, >> I am developing a Midi music player, using the .mid and .pdf >> generated by lilypond with the \pointAndClickOn, for educational >> purpose. >> >> Others players "invent" the music s

Re: Point and Click also into the MIDI file

Op Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:41:18 + (UTC) Silvio Ardito schreef: > Dear Sirs, > I am developing a Midi music player, using the .mid and .pdf > generated by lilypond with the \pointAndClickOn, for educational > purpose. > > Others players "invent" the music score from the .mid, not a true > music

Re: Creates pure conversion for Flag::calc_y_offset (issue 5934050)

On Mar 29, 2012, at 11:25 AM, tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com wrote: > Mike, I don't understand how the commit message and title relate to this > change, probably due to some misunderstanding on my part. How does this > create a pure conversion for Flag::calc_y_offset? > Trevor > Sorry...forgot to

Re: Creates pure conversion for Flag::calc_y_offset (issue 5934050)

Mike, I don't understand how the commit message and title relate to this change, probably due to some misunderstanding on my part. How does this create a pure conversion for Flag::calc_y_offset? Trevor http://codereview.appspot.com/5934050/ ___ lilypo

Point and Click also into the MIDI file

Dear Sirs, I am developing a Midi music player, using the .mid and .pdf generated by lilypond with the \pointAndClickOn, for educational purpose. Others players "invent" the music score from the .mid, not a true music score. If the same informations, line and column, are in the midi file, it is p

Re: casual contributors

Hello, 2012/3/23 Janek Warchoł : > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:06 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> "What impressed you most about the LilyPond code base?"  "No comment." >> "But I really want to know!" "I just told you." > > LOL!!  That's a quote-of-the-month! > Janek :D > Having just read his thread I