m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Hey all,
To further debug 2801, I am looking for a way to not have to run the
regtests every time to make the bug appear.
Do you mean have to run the regtests or do you mean have people run
the regtests?
The time for make test-clean make
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com; Devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
Yes. Did you get your
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com; Devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:05 AM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at
Graham/Phil,
On 11 September 2012 09:51, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com; Devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September
Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes:
On 01/09/12 17:25, Graham Percival wrote:
Continuing to brainstorm on the problem of it not being obvious to
which note a particular \command refers to, what if we used:
\postfix: c2 d\p is unchanged
/prefix: for music
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands
Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes:
On 01/09/12 17:25, Graham Percival
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I've always thought that the post-event nature of lilypond is its own
worst enemy. My particular pet peeve is that it means you can't
terminate a piano pedal P with an asterisk * on the last note of a
piece, since the \sustainOn occupies the post-event
On 11 September 2012 14:04, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Ok, and now for something completely different. I think there has been
one proposal to bring \[ \] in line with the post-event nature of [ ]
and ( ), but the one thing I have been thinking about recently is
whether we should not
Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com writes:
On 11 September 2012 14:04, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Ok, and now for something completely different. I think there has been
one proposal to bring \[ \] in line with the post-event nature of [ ]
and ( ), but the one thing I have been
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I've always thought that the post-event nature of
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I've always
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:04 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes:
On 01/09/12 17:25, Graham Percival wrote:
Continuing to brainstorm on the problem of it not being obvious to
which note a particular \command refers to, what if we
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
But things like ( ) \( \) [ ] \p \ \! \ all happen at a moment in
time in a voice. Why is a tempo change a separate event, but a
dynamic change isn't?
Specifically, I think it is because the tempo logically is an
interpretation property, and may
Hello list,
for my work on the volta bracket inclusion for the new bar line interface,
I need to know how the bars are ordered in (ly:grob-object grob 'bars).
Please see the attached file.
For the \musOne, I get a grob array with eight BarLine grobs
(two for each staff) for the first volta
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:01:28PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Hmm. Still getting the same problem. The following directories are
missing:
gub/uploads/localdoc/V2.17.2
gub/uploads/webdoc/V2.17.2
gub/uploads/webtest/V2.17.2
gub/uploads/webtest/V2.17.2/compare-etc
This prevents the
Hi folks,
I just noticed mention of these in the GLISS pre/post/neutral command
thread.
What do these commands do?
If there's discussion about converting them to modern syntax,
presumably they'll need documenting etc. and we'll need to describe
them in terms thickos like me can understand on
Hello,
2012/9/11 Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk
Hi folks,
I just noticed mention of these in the GLISS pre/post/neutral command
thread.
What do these commands do?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/ancient-notation_002d_002dcommon-features#ligatures
HTH
Marek Klein
Hey Thicko! ;)
On 11 September 2012 17:15, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
Hi folks,
I just noticed mention of these in the GLISS pre/post/neutral command
thread.
What do these commands do?
If there's discussion about converting them to modern syntax,
presumably they'll need
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com; Devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at
On 11 sept. 2012, at 17:48, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Hello list,
for my work on the volta bracket inclusion for the new bar line interface,
I need to know how the bars are ordered in (ly:grob-object grob 'bars).
Please see the attached file.
For the \musOne, I get a grob array
Am 11.09.2012 20:48, schrieb m...@mikesolomon.org:
On 11 sept. 2012, at 17:48, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Hello list,
for my work on the volta bracket inclusion for the new bar line interface,
I need to know how the bars are ordered in (ly:grob-object grob 'bars).
Please see the
Am 11.09.2012 21:08, schrieb m...@mikesolomon.org:
On 11 sept. 2012, at 22:02, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 11.09.2012 20:48, schrieb m...@mikesolomon.org:
On 11 sept. 2012, at 17:48, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Hello list,
for my work on the volta bracket inclusion for the new
On 11 sept. 2012, at 22:29, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Are you certain that every vertical axis group will always contain the same
number of bar lines? If not, it's possible that the matrix you're talking
about may not have complete rows, in which case it's difficult to know how
Am 11.09.2012 21:54, schrieb m...@mikesolomon.org:
On 11 sept. 2012, at 22:29, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Are you certain that every vertical axis group will always contain the same
number of bar lines? If not, it's possible that the matrix you're talking
about may not have complete
http://codereview.appspot.com/6498077/diff/6033/lily/phrasing-slur-engraver.cc
File lily/phrasing-slur-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6498077/diff/6033/lily/phrasing-slur-engraver.cc#newcode116
lily/phrasing-slur-engraver.cc:116: Grob *stub = make_spanner
(SlurStub,
This works, although in surprising ways.
It was a challenge for me to figure out why the tests in
'repeat-sign.ly' come out as they do. I was very surprised by the lines
marked dots in outer spaces and dots outside and assume we would
prefer more centered placement.
that's sort of all
Short story: some files in the lilypond source are missing
copyright/licensing headers, but for the most part this doesn't seem
like a big deal. As they get edited or otherwise patched, it would be
helpful to add them.
Longer story: During my preparations for uploading 2.16.0 to Debian
On 11/09/12 13:04, David Kastrup wrote:
Basically every construct that we would be tempted to use or s1*0 for
occasionally is one that is not really attached to a note, but rather to
a moment in time. You can put it in parallel music without changing
results. Most articulations with a
On 11/09/12 14:15, David Kastrup wrote:
No. Just those commands that are not intrinsically attached to a note
within a voice, like dynamics and phrasings. Basically those things
that you'd occasionally attach to or s1*0 for lack of something more
suitable.
In the case of dynamics, you
For 20:00 MDT Thursday Sept 13 (really!)
Documentation:
Issue 2817
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2817: list Elysium
on Easier Editing webpage - R 6488101
http://codereview.appspot.com/6488101/
Enhancement:
Issue 2811
Hmm. IMO, Elysium should be listed under the text editors section,
while the top recommended section should not be alphabetized.
However, I'm open to a re-think of the page, wherein we drop the
recommended-ness, and/or group programs differently, and/or whatever
else might be good to change. I
31 matches
Mail list logo
