Thomas Morley writes:
> 2012/10/31 Janek Warchoł :
> [...]
>> Is it
>> possible to define (create) a new property from the user level? I
>> don't recall any information about this.
>>
>> Janek
>
> see:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-05/msg00543.html
>
> But I didn't try i
2012/10/31 Janek Warchoł :
[...]
> Is it
> possible to define (create) a new property from the user level? I
> don't recall any information about this.
>
> Janek
see:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-05/msg00543.html
But I didn't try it with latest devel-version.
-Harm
Janek Warchoł writes:
>>> {
>>> \override Stem #'my-funky-property = #5
>>> }
>
> ok, i see that doing what i demonstrated was a bad idea. Is it
> possible to define (create) a new property from the user level? I
> don't recall any information about this.
I don't think we have an interface f
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:01 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> I'm not sure if i understand you correctly.
>>
>> Currently (checked with 2.17.3) i can write this in LilyPond code
>> (verbatim):
>
> It likely does not pass 2.17.6.
good to know.
>> {
>> \override Stem #'my-fu
Hello,
This patch add "español" as an alias for "espanol"
which allows
\language "español"
{ do' re' mi' }
http://codereview.appspot.com/6811060/
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
___
lilypond-devel mailing li
On 2012/10/31 11:55:12, david.nalesnik wrote:
Thank you--I am a bit worried!
Speaking of "patch," when I run git format-patch I get six separate
patches. Is
there any way to compress them into one so this is more convenient for
you?
-David
Try if you can git send-email to work for you.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6730044/diff/40002/ly/engraver-init.ly
File ly/engraver-init.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6730044/diff/40002/ly/engraver-init.ly#newcode88
ly/engraver-init.ly:88: \consists "Footnote_engraver"
Any idea where this line is from? It just appears in the la
Thank you--I am a bit worried!
Speaking of "patch," when I run git format-patch I get six separate
patches. Is there any way to compress them into one so this is more
convenient for you?
-David
https://codereview.appspot.com/6730044/
___
lilypond-de
On 2012/10/31 11:41:19, david.nalesnik wrote:
David,
I don't mind making the changes, but I'm running into some problems.
I used git
pull -r before making a patch set and uploading to rietveld, but
looking over
the patch set there I see that other changes have found their way
in--includin
David,
I don't mind making the changes, but I'm running into some problems. I
used git pull -r before making a patch set and uploading to rietveld,
but looking over the patch set there I see that other changes have found
their way in--including your check-grob-path function.
I'm probably making
Janek Warchoł writes:
> Hmm, if i'm reading git log correctly, i'm too late to give my LGTM to
> pushing these changes... ;)
> Anyway, i'm very happy to see this change!
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:07 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Keith OHara writes:
>>> In this case since both searches fail I
Hmm, if i'm reading git log correctly, i'm too late to give my LGTM to
pushing these changes... ;)
Anyway, i'm very happy to see this change!
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:07 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Keith OHara writes:
>> In this case since both searches fail I suppose the parser should warn
>>
Keith OHara writes:
> David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
>>
>> > I timed LilyPond setting the percussion parts of a symphony,
>
>> Huh, I'd not have expected a net slowdown. Were you using the version
>> _after_ running convert-ly, or are we talking about "compat
13 matches
Mail list logo
