Looks good.
Gotta love monogamy.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi,
I met a former colleague in the bus to Chemnitz, and he is at least
knowledgeable about EU research programmes. Do people here have ideas
about possible institutions who could be made to participate? I think
the conditions are institutions from at least three EU countries, and
monetary
On 26 mars 2013, at 10:52, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
I met a former colleague in the bus to Chemnitz, and he is at least
knowledgeable about EU research programmes. Do people here have ideas
about possible institutions who could be made to participate? I think
the
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
I met a former colleague in the bus to Chemnitz, and he is at least
knowledgeable about EU research programmes. Do people here have ideas
about possible institutions who could be made to participate? I think
Take in
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:52 AM
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I met a former colleague in the bus to Chemnitz, and he is at least
knowledgeable about EU research programmes. Do people here have ideas
about possible institutions
LGTM
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/7494049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Trevor Daniels:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:52 AM
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I met a former colleague in the bus to Chemnitz, and he is at least
knowledgeable about EU research programmes. Do people here have ideas
about
On 03/26/2013 11:52 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Take in mind that EU research programmes come with an incredible
amount of burocracy and require both academic and industry partners,
the more the merrier. The projects that get funded are buzzword
compliant, but often nobody knows what they set
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/7974046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote
Eluze writes:
lol - I gave an idea of what I mean, so please read (and answer to)
the full contribution!
Sorry ;-)
your silly answer isn't really a push towards a user-friendly
interface!
Yes, I'm working on that too. Too little time, seemingly, for
Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes:
And, sad to say, it wouldn't surprise me if this call has been issued
in anticipation of a preconceived product development by Sibelius
(despite UK office defunct-ness), Finale or Steinberg, in
collaboration with already selected
Regarding MusicXML support: Michael Good, the creator of MusicXML, is
now working for MakeMusic (the creators of Finale), and the way I
understood his comments on the MusicXML mailing list he would be very
interested in LilyPond having MusicXML export functionality, too. Maybe
you can even
https://codereview.appspot.com/7834043/diff/13001/Documentation/snippets/new/applying-note-head-styles-depending-on-the-step-of-the-scale.ly
File
Documentation/snippets/new/applying-note-head-styles-depending-on-the-step-of-the-scale.ly
(right):
Hello,
A bit of a short interval this time as I will be off for the Easter Weekend
- staging merge will continue to run but patch testing after Thursday
evening will have to be done by someone else until I am back testing on
Tuesday morning.
I'll then resume doing Patches Countdown on Tuesday
Reviewers: ,
Message:
pushed as bd26755d6208ce93e12d701e9f0b4ac72180bacd, closed
Description:
Remove unused include in break-alignment-interface
Nothing from self-alingnment-interface was used in break alignment,
so no need to include its header. This patch shouldn't change
anything in Lily
On 2013/03/24 16:39:03, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Please choose between patchsets 4 and 5.
I prefer 5. The warning does no harm if it is
never triggered, but is there in case some future
change elsewhere assumes a non-empty stencil will
be aligned even if its extent is empty. It is
relevant
There are two critical issues that we're going to have to start seriously
thinking about now if 2.18 is going to happen anytime soon:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2733
I'm not comfortable marking this critical: not because it is not critical for
Laura, nor because it may
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656
This is really bad. I agree that it is critical. I unfortunately
have no way to test this, but do people have an ETA for fixing this?
If not, it will hold 2.18 up for a long time, in which it may be
worth pushing the translate_axis
On 27 mars 2013, at 07:54, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656
This is really bad. I agree that it is critical. I unfortunately
have no way to test this, but do people have an ETA for fixing this?
If not, it will hold 2.18 up for
19 matches
Mail list logo
