https://codereview.appspot.com/11303044/diff/1/configure.ac
File configure.ac (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/11303044/diff/1/configure.ac#newcode125
configure.ac:125: STEPMAKE_GUILE_DEVEL(REQUIRED, 1.8.2, 2.0.0)
As far as I know, 1.9 is the development series culminating in the
stable
Hi,
Attached is a version of the regression test scheme-text-spanner.ly which
shows that problems arise when the engraver is used simultaneously in
different contexts. I've smply created a StaffGroup in which both Staff
contexts contain the same material as in the original reg test.
You can see
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
All spanners appear when I replace the variable definition
(event-drul '(() . ()))
with
(cons (list) (list))
and later (line 157):
(set! event-drul '(() . ()))
with
(set! event-drul (cons (list) (list)))
I'd like to fix the problem,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:03:31PM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
As far as I know, 1.9 is the development series culminating in the
stable 2.0, so while 1.9 is not all too likely to be installed on
current systems, allowing/preferring it over 1.8 is not going to be
helpful. I think the cutoff
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.cawrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:03:31PM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
As far as I know, 1.9 is the development series culminating in the
stable 2.0, so while 1.9 is not all too likely to be installed on
current
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:06 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
All spanners appear when I replace the variable definition
(event-drul '(() . ()))
with
(cons (list) (list))
and later (line 157):
(set! event-drul '(() .
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:06 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
So with (cons '() '()) you should be fine.
IIRC, completize-grob-entry running on all-grob-descriptions also
commits this kind of sacrilege.
Eek. So that means that the
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:02 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
(set! all-grob-descriptions (sort all-grob-descriptions alist?))
is perfectly fine since it does not touch the original list. sort!
however would be a problem.
In a similar
LGTM
Thanks for adding these, Harm.
https://codereview.appspot.com/11427044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
