Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49:42AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
What's wrong with GitHub, anyway?
It requires separate accounts and credentials (much more likely to be a
target for attacks), has its
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49:42AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
What's wrong with GitHub, anyway?
It requires separate accounts and credentials (much more
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Cc: Julien Rioux julien.ri...@gmail.com; LilyPond Developmet Team
lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: we now have
2013/9/22 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
IMHO this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Using LilyDev (possibly
in a Virtual Machine) provides git and git-cl. Git allows a developer to
create a patch with 2 commands: git commit and git format-patch. That can
be uploaded to Rietveld
2013/9/22 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2013/9/22 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
IMHO this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Using LilyDev (possibly
in a Virtual Machine) provides git and git-cl. Git allows a developer to
create a patch with 2 commands: git commit and git
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org; David Kastrup d...@gnu.org; Julien
Rioux julien.ri...@gmail.com; LilyPond Developmet Team
lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
So the question is what we should be telling the Savannah operators
to make working on GNU projects using Git more feasible.
What about asking them to provide Gerrit as
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org; David Kastrup d...@gnu.org;
Julien Rioux julien.ri...@gmail.com; LilyPond Developmet Team
2013/9/18 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Translation workflows don't use our
review system or issue trackers.
And I don't even think they would benefit from it. If we take a look at
the few reasonably tightly tracked translations (French and Spanish, I
think), I very much doubt that you'd
I think a patch like this requires at least one regression test.
https://codereview.appspot.com/13256053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2013/9/22 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
IMHO this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Using LilyDev
(possibly in a Virtual Machine) provides git and git-cl. Git allows a
developer to create a patch with 2 commands: git commit and git
format-patch.
When i go to http://lilynet.net/, i see
Fedora Test Page
This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP
server after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it
means that the web server installed at this site is working properly,
but has not yet been configured
It's
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:57:42PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
So the question is what we should be telling the Savannah operators to
make working on GNU projects using Git more feasible.
What about asking them to provide Gerrit as a service?
That's
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 05:30:04PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2013/9/22 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
IMHO this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Using LilyDev (possibly
in a Virtual Machine) provides git and git-cl.
How hard is that?
Hard.
Good.
(aside: note that my email
14 matches
Mail list logo
