Stanza number not sliding under time signature (issue 2469?)

2013-10-12 Thread Robert Memering
Dear all, I have a score with stanza numbers at the beginning that refuse to slide under the time signature (with version 2.17.28). According to issue 2469, this should be fixed as of 2.15.40. In all my other scores that use the same layout and settings, this doesn't happen. Unfortunately, in

Re: Stanza number not sliding under time signature (issue 2469?)

2013-10-12 Thread Eluze
Robert Memering-2 wrote Dear all, I have a score with stanza numbers at the beginning that refuse to slide under the time signature (with version 2.17.28). According to issue 2469, this should be fixed as of 2.15.40. In all my other scores that use the same layout and settings, this

Re: Stanza number not sliding under time signature (issue 2469?)

2013-10-12 Thread David Kastrup
Robert Memering memer...@uni-muenster.de writes: Dear all, I have a score with stanza numbers at the beginning that refuse to slide under the time signature (with version 2.17.28). According to issue 2469, this should be fixed as of 2.15.40. In all my other scores that use the same layout

Re: Stanza number not sliding under time signature (issue 2469?) SOLVED

2013-10-12 Thread Robert Memering
Am 12.10.2013 17:39, schrieb David Kastrup: Robert Memering memer...@uni-muenster.de writes: Dear all, I have a score with stanza numbers at the beginning that refuse to slide under the time signature (with version 2.17.28). According to issue 2469, this should be fixed as of 2.15.40. In

2.18 schedule/incoming issues

2013-10-12 Thread David Kastrup
Ok folks, I am currently swamped: we recently had an influx of near-trivial documentation bugs/requests that would warrant attention. There are also smaller bits and pieces, but here is the beef on the 2.18 situation: There are quite few issues left that need to be dealt with consistently before

Re: Stanza number not sliding under time signature (issue 2469?) SOLVED

2013-10-12 Thread David Kastrup
Robert Memering memer...@uni-muenster.de writes: Am 12.10.2013 17:39, schrieb David Kastrup: Well, the best workaround is to a) prepare a small example clearly demonstrating the problem and/or b) show that the examples used for issue 2469 no longer work like they did after fix Then

Re: 2.18 schedule/incoming issues

2013-10-12 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 5:12 PM Subject: 2.18 schedule/incoming issues Ok folks, I am currently swamped: we recently had an influx of near-trivial documentation bugs/requests that would warrant

Doc: Change Balloon Text example (issue 14626043)

2013-10-12 Thread PhilEHolmes
Minor nit https://codereview.appspot.com/14626043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely File Documentation/notation/editorial.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/14626043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely#newcode541 Documentation/notation/editorial.itely:541:

Make \tweak ... Grob equivalent to \override rather than \once \override (issue 14503043)

2013-10-12 Thread k-ohara5a5a
I'm not sure what you are trying to do, but if you mean to make \tweak #'transparent ##t NoteHead do a permanent override, this code doesn't do that. This code would make \hide NoteHead always act like \once\hide NoteHead.