Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
July 30th.
You can always view the most current countdown list here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=patch
__
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/112500043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/115840045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/116990043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/119060044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: ,
Message:
This is a bit of housekeeping, coming from research for a recent
presentation of LilyPond to a group of church musicians.
Description:
DOC: minor revisions to Easier Editing
Moved tunefl per comment 1 issue 2660
Moved LilyPondTool to "No longer developed" per Bertalan Fodo
Hi David & all,
2014-07-25 21:34 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>> 2) i didn't manage to get midi stuff done inside the same function as
>> the layout stuff - but i think that i'll be able to solve that if i
>> have a solution to 1).
>
> You basically need to collect just the
On 2014/07/26 06:49:41, janek wrote:
Setting TextScript.cross-staff property to #f is required to
ensure
that there are no collisions between TextScripts and cross-staff
notes:
(see also beam-cross-staff-auto-knee.ly)
As far as I can see, we don't want TextScript.cros
Hi Keith,
sorry for writing so late - i didn't notice this patch until yesterday
and i didn't have time for reviewing it today... The changes looks
promising! I'll give it a closer look tomorrow, hopefully in the
morning.
best,
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/117050043/
_
https://codereview.appspot.com/117050043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2014-07-26 20:45 GMT+02:00 Mark Polesky :
> On Dec 17 2009, with commit #05eb689, I tracked down the
> "birth commits" for the individual manuals in order to
> establish the initial years for copyright purposes:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=05eb689
>
> But n
On Dec 17 2009, with commit #05eb689, I tracked down the
"birth commits" for the individual manuals in order to
establish the initial years for copyright purposes:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=05eb689
But now I see that none of the commit numbers I documented
James wrote:
>> How is that list even generated? I can't figure it out
>> from the source code.
>
> git grep 01e371f
James,
I know that the IR is auto-generated, I'm actually the one
who added the line you're referencing:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=05eb689
What
On 26/07/14 00:33, Mark Polesky wrote:
> David Nalesnik wrote:
>>> I noticed that the 'baseline-skip property works with the
>>> InstrumentName grob, which confuses me, because in the IR
>>> entry for IntsrumentName, none of the supported interfaces
>>> listed at the bottom provide the 'baseline-sk
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:25 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> I think we should also add font-interface, as InstrumentName responds to
> font-shape, for example.
>
>
Already included :)
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> David Nalesnik wrote:
> >> I noticed that the 'baseline-skip property works with the
> >> InstrumentName grob, which confuses me, because in the IR
> >> entry for IntsrumentName, none of the supported interfaces
> >> listed at the bottom prov
16 matches
Mail list logo