Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review, thanks!
-Paul
Description:
Fix issue 4040: Dots ignoring shifted ledger lines
includes the following two commits:
add test staff-ledger-positions-dotted-notes.ly
tests positioning of dots on dotted notes with
custom ledger line positions (issue 4040)
sta
Hi all,
I'm suffering from a weird problem which I think is related to the
dotted-list notation. It is very annoying because it blocks an important
merge on the way towards a unified library infrastructure. Unfortunately
I can't produce a minimal working example, as it seems that the problem
Masamichi HOSODA writes:
> I've succeed to upgrade GUB's ghostscript to 9.15 in this branch.
> https://github.com/trueroad/gub/tree/ghostscript-9.15
>
> I've succeed GUB's ``make lilypond'' by ghostscript-9.15.
> All lilypond installers have been build.
>
> In mingw (Windows):
> Ghostscript can h
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
March 25th.
You can always view the most current countdown list here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=patch
_
Patch counted down - please push
If this is not ready to go please can you set the tracker accordingly?
If nothing is changed for the next countdown (25th March) I'll set the
tracker to 'needs_work'.
James
https://codereview.appspot.com/209320043/
_
I've succeed to upgrade GUB's ghostscript to 9.15 in this branch.
https://github.com/trueroad/gub/tree/ghostscript-9.15
I've succeed GUB's ``make lilypond'' by ghostscript-9.15.
All lilypond installers have been build.
In mingw (Windows):
Ghostscript can handle unicode filenames.
I've tested lily
Richard Shann writes:
> On Sun, 2015-03-22 at 08:01 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>>
>> > Now while this works it seems rather clunky, so I'm wondering if there
>> > is a more elegant way of doing this. Symbols look like they might
>> > help, but so far I've failed to
On Sun, 2015-03-22 at 08:01 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
> > Now while this works it seems rather clunky, so I'm wondering if there
> > is a more elegant way of doing this. Symbols look like they might
> > help, but so far I've failed to make anything work. I've also
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> Now while this works it seems rather clunky, so I'm wondering if there
> is a more elegant way of doing this. Symbols look like they might
> help, but so far I've failed to make anything work. I've also failed
> with macros, but that's likely because I don't understan
