Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the Danish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/da.po
(We can arrange things so that
hello,
On 09/04/15 16:10, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
But the situation overall is a nuisance.
Might be worth keeping a weather eye on Launchpad, as this is free
software and is currently in the process of gaining git support:
https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git
Interesting!
It's been a while sinc
>> But the situation overall is a nuisance.
>
> Might be worth keeping a weather eye on Launchpad, as this is free
> software and is currently in the process of gaining git support:
> https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git
Interesting!
> It's been a while since I last used it, but it has a nice
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/225040043/diff/40001/lily/include/sources.hh
File lily/include/sources.hh (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/225040043/diff/40001/lily/include/sources.hh#newcode27
lily/include/sources.hh:27: static SCM source_file_list;
static? That means that every compilat
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
April 12th.
You can always view the most current countdown list here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=patch
This patch has been put back to 'needs work' based on Werner's comments
above.
https://codereview.appspot.com/214250043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Am 09.04.2015 um 07:14 schrieb d...@gnu.org:
>> On 2015/04/08 20:18:55, lemzwerg wrote:
>>
>>> It's not clear to me what you expect and how it should work.
>>
>> Letting PostScript ask for Helvetica which will let GhostScript fall
>> back to the URW version when the origi
Am 09.04.2015 um 07:14 schrieb d...@gnu.org:
On 2015/04/08 20:18:55, lemzwerg wrote:
> I like the current overall look for _this_ choice of fonts
> better afterwards as compared to before, even though the "C"
> glyph has a more conspicuous rounding and the "G" glyph has
> the well-known somewhat
On 2015/04/08 22:16:57, Dan Eble wrote:
When I have time, I'll show you some stuff from my own templates.
... which would be useless to you because I've still got partcombiner
modifications that are not in Lilypond yet. Never mind.
https://codereview.appspot.com/225860043/
__
